Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate-00.txt

Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no> Tue, 25 June 2013 11:37 UTC

Return-Path: <tore@fud.no>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C4F21F9DE3 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 04:37:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SXiTUOesKJK3 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 04:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from greed.fud.no (greed.fud.no [IPv6:2a02:c0:1001:100::145]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C517B21F9CBB for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 04:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [2a02:fe0:cf16:20:21d:60ff:fe48:f59e] (port=34044 helo=wrath.fud.no) by greed.fud.no with esmtpa (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <tore@fud.no>) id 1UrRZ6-0007lL-3s; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 13:37:40 +0200
Message-ID: <51C98103.4050008@fud.no>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 13:37:39 +0200
From: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130514 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate-00.txt
References: <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F85151@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <51C56E60.5040009@fud.no> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B9237F3@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <CAKr6gn17O+B78HJofr-z7Nsgv-y8+w4hgKy+YPicgNS126qwXA@mail.gmail.com> <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F870FC@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAKr6gn2zu2n-pJMirG-seN5WX=Evyquu9EqqLOV-zf-RKQ9eYg@mail.gmail.com> <20130625015317.6B256363BD8F@drugs.dv.isc.org> <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F878B0@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <20130625040207.1CCA7363C42A@drugs.dv.isc.org> <CAKr6gn1cnGfktfKraQegHNP_kjHyzNKGzw3ZDe1cZ__Czsu_kw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKr6gn1cnGfktfKraQegHNP_kjHyzNKGzw3ZDe1cZ__Czsu_kw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org 6man-wg" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:37:45 -0000

* George Michaelson

> One thing I *strongly* agree with: the sentence at 2.2:
> 
>                   The effective MTU for IPv6 is 1280 bytes.
> 
> This is looking compellingly awful, but true to me.

I believe this is a gross exaggeration. I'm running 1500 bytes MTU on
all the clients and servers in my network, and have yet to hear about
significant trouble (there have been a few, but no more than what I get
with IPv4 as well).

So to see if this was only me, I tried to do a simple" wget -6" of all
the URLs listed in the top 100 sites sorted by Alexa rank at
http://www.worldipv6launch.org/participants/?q=1 and looked at what TCP
MSS values I got back:

TCP MSS   Count
---------------
1212      2
1220      6
1380      6
1410      3
1416      1
1420      1
1436      1
1440      67
1460      1
Total     88


Only 9% were operating on the premise that «the effective MTU for IPv6
is [<=] 1280 bytes», while a clear majority of 77% were operating with
an MTU of [>=] 1500.

(I did not get exactly 100 successful TCP handshakes because some URLs
were down, some did not have an IPv6 address published in DNS, while on
the other hand some were giving me HTTP redirects, which results in
multiple handshakes.)

Tore