IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Subject: Confirming consensus on adopting draft-carpenter-6man-why64

David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu> Thu, 13 March 2014 14:26 UTC

Return-Path: <farmer@umn.edu>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C171A0424 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 07:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.747
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.747 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JF2_5qa4atkI for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 07:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs-a.tc.umn.edu (vs-a.tc.umn.edu [134.84.135.107]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC72C1A049C for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 07:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-f175.google.com (mail-ig0-f175.google.com [209.85.213.175]) by vs-a.tc.umn.edu (UMN smtpd) with ESMTP for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 09:26:10 -0500 (CDT)
X-Umn-Remote-Mta: [N] mail-ig0-f175.google.com [209.85.213.175] #+LO+TS+TR
X-Umn-Classification: local
Received: by mail-ig0-f175.google.com with SMTP id ur14so17292905igb.2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 07:26:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:reply-to:organization :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JRn7bK4oi5G6zUOBH0jHkXTvpoOOjDGU0li10rttgOk=; b=AR2siHT/OQ597NDApm12NtSJLApsD2N5DSiugocVWNtYmIKD+cFQmnA9EtihLMcux8 rBVU6s2sKQT9K5Ew5soj9fti4ju026zJYxV3dj47LbMmsCuy9iVC3qsh57zW6nCQVmeN 2FF4U1ljIoq1b7PWuzRc4mfkSvPSy9JljJRLOsaiWseu6DKNC5dCp0WLRq1lStO1nEW9 eWPDykXTLG/ugKylHSPEf+sbF02nQ9V2i8FTaomOh8KXkMQE0xo0iig2tbh3x7y3yONU VCijnM9t1FEwiyyoYfKQONqopce+TvcgG4lzXu+fl7gr1GUg/MH3M0fXwPiq6ETLVyBH h4rQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnytNb4AVbcbCBaiuEI6AAhOd+aTcANKeP3uZZHjHv2qhyMjLV+MmEk5KvXajG5FqKXBwe5HODv71TjdOzCEgHSxFCQ6Rz28qQEVBKARe5t3dl6ucGIr3YpSLBnESY/ZQJR94FD
X-Received: by 10.50.66.227 with SMTP id i3mr2096095igt.19.1394720769679; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 07:26:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.50.66.227 with SMTP id i3mr2096064igt.19.1394720769515; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 07:26:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oit201651646.local (c-24-118-200-23.hsd1.mn.comcast.net. [24.118.200.23]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id an1sm8930343igc.0.2014.03.13.07.26.05 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Mar 2014 07:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5321BF60.4000001@umn.edu>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 09:23:28 -0500
From: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
Organization: University of Minnesota
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>, sthaug@nethelp.no
Subject: Re: Subject: Confirming consensus on adopting draft-carpenter-6man-why64
References: <CAKD1Yr2MBfi-JtYKNCw2bfQKWRuZuq_q2DGTU-szN-HDvoEmeA@mail.gmail.com> <20140312.124141.112597605.sthaug@nethelp.no> <1394657539.27638.33.camel@tachyon.blake> <20140312.222131.74706487.sthaug@nethelp.no> <CAKD1Yr2wg65-hg=8_qctB5CMDNbMu8ur-iVn87BwbpTsobCVQA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr2wg65-hg=8_qctB5CMDNbMu8ur-iVn87BwbpTsobCVQA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/jQbnCFh1-bV0nC9muUpVmd22Dbc
Cc: IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>, slblake@petri-meat.com
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 14:26:18 -0000

On 3/13/14, 01:41 , Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:21 AM, <sthaug@nethelp.no
> <mailto:sthaug@nethelp.no>> wrote:
>
>     I don't really have a problem with that, as long as it's possible
>     to use them. I *do* have a problem with trying to prohibit specific
>     prefix lengths > 64.
>
>
> Oh, you *can* use them. You just can't use very many of them, because
> they get deaggregated into /128 matches :-D

The discussion of these limitations in routing implementations needs 
more details, this is the kind of thing that puts meat on the argument 
and makes the argument more than "because I said so".

Please help Brian by providing more details on this issue to go in the 
draft.

-- 
================================================
David Farmer               Email: farmer@umn.edu
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE     Phone: 1-612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029  Cell: 1-612-812-9952
================================================

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email