Re: Late IPR Disclosure regarding draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark

I maintain my position in support of the publication of this document.

Regards,
Greg

On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 2:08 PM Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> wrote:

> [chair hat on]
>
> The main goal of this call is to confirm if the document still
> represents the WG consensus, even after an IPR disclosure.
> Therefore I'd like to ask people to explicitly express their opinions.
> Especially if you said smth during the original WGCL, please let the
> chairs know if you have (or haven't) changed your mind.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 2:45 AM Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > It has come to our attention that an IRP disclosure was made on
> draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark after the 6MAN w.g. working group and IETF
> last call ended. The history is:
> >
> > 6MAN W.G. Last call Started 20-Dec-2020
> > 6MAN W.G. Last call Ended 7-Mar-2021
> > IETF Last Call started 1-Jun-2021
> > IETF Last Call Ended 15-Jun-2021
> > IPR Disclosure on 26-Nov-2021 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/5320/)
> >
> > We find it troublesome that this IPR disclosure was submitted so late,
> especially since one of the listed inventors is also an author of this
> draft.
> >
> > Consequently, we are starting a two week w.g. last call to determine if
> there is still a w.g. consensus to advance this document. Please respond to
> the list if you still support the advancement of this document to the IESG
> for Proposed Standard, or if you think it should be returned to the w.g. to
> be reconsidered.
> >
> > The last call will end on 14 July 2022.
> >
> > Bob, Jen
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>