IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses

Alex Abrahams <alex@technicalenlightenment.com> Tue, 27 March 2012 09:28 UTC

Return-Path: <alex@technicalenlightenment.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3226321F8841 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 02:28:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uIfNGsXnJ6Lq for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 02:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8757821F853B for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 02:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iazz13 with SMTP id z13so11308237iaz.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 02:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=XKVlAb2iYmXVt0AA8BlKwsV+LqOSy3ETOV+h2PXR69k=; b=dy00HSZoz0W4JWGV1yBWxuAnFd/ukUKELbT38+oNsk1uqDUDsD8lRkSA8CsNs7j1Nc M5IXM/lf0kIjVi+R09TqmzMZfmd5TggiZgKq6yxFQp468K3xOAMiwMF9ccalzL7jVaXx yzWMUU+o9HzTHzAk/XVwA/dzlRvhafn13kJixBtLrnf809aRCsSG6oxNNUYDeCEiXfDD SimR8U5o41mZESbMoKMfOdmIEhaYmLRp7x9DlspZ5p5OajgseUmYhgjURgCMkr+Lwx0m VHLG2iprwschqBp4a4xVW+ht5NEzYJN54E1snIWPS1Y9jB6/rub9Nbi6xn4dtO68Btjp fz6g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.222.162 with SMTP id qn2mr7950991igc.65.1332840538127; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 02:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.247.198 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 02:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [94.193.97.134]
In-Reply-To: <4F717DD3.7030907@viagenie.ca>
References: <4F716D5C.40402@innovationslab.net> <4F717DD3.7030907@viagenie.ca>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 05:28:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CAFnCNEdRa0yqy4q3Ow7pgAupUqBrBORXvL4SjbUNdctmNQ98fA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses
From: Alex Abrahams <alex@technicalenlightenment.com>
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14dae9340fbfd13e1804bc361e0a"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlKFRuvk6ZX5JYY+tEvJsnUggIMGdbYvBMJ6mnUX/S86rYpKrA6Z3zywQQZqKf5tsOcOo5a
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:28:59 -0000

I also prefer B. I haven't decided if I'll use privacy addresses myself,
but I think:
a) I don't want to assume the working life of cookies and even http is the
same as ipv6, don't want it to drive this decision (I'm not advocating a
return to gopher ;) )

b) I'd like IP logs to be just that, something to be looked after, but not
something I have law after law to think about, changing country to country,
because .gov think I am tracking people. (e.g. You can't log IPs centrally
because that is personal data, which can't leave the country) I'm not
saying tracking people is good or bad (not going there), just that I want
to be free of that kind of oversight as much as possible.

Alex

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status