Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-spring-srv6-oam-11: (with COMMENT)
Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 03 June 2021 06:49 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FDB73A2CD3; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 23:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-6man-spring-srv6-oam@ietf.org, 6man-chairs@ietf.org, ipv6@ietf.org, Ole Trøan <ot@cisco.com>
Subject: Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-spring-srv6-oam-11: (with COMMENT)
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.30.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <162270294548.29805.15112949596995827935@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 23:49:05 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/jvyhDPyCBG2MZBQSSCejd-_E-g0>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 06:49:06 -0000
Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-6man-spring-srv6-oam-11: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-spring-srv6-oam/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The shepherd writeup omits an answer to the question "Why is this the proper type of RFC?" Although "TC" and "IS-IS" are defined in the glossary in Section 1.2, they appear in no other sections. (It's "ISIS" elsewhere.") In Section 1.3, I don't think you can start a sentence with "e.g." In Section 2.1: It says, "The processing node SHOULD rate-limit the number of packets ...", but no guidance is given on what a good rate might be.
- Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-6ma… Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker