IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Popping)

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 06 December 2019 19:38 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19D612006D for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 11:38:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qR1zu9cn4ssK for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 11:38:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42d.google.com (mail-pf1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17BAD12004A for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 11:38:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id n13so3853933pff.1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 11:38:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=usUFMvKyG5TpsnYB0NHsBWHlkCXid5uUxZx6vu6SkA4=; b=X7GWkCsdL9WEfFmDBwaSTpRDioxv5XGRVmI4amvXJuQSeSO85C16bL+hGBRAZae6DY ocEN4Tofyo1dWHJOMDMQuN/n0ye7ZgCls91t0ctyAhKFYSCNJzrWl2j7j3ABwujjzz8J K/C/K4rf329zpzyYynWKOqWEqgV00A+cvFa9ldA4bQpKI2zIVXlhuNQtokkb3nF/sruw WM4A/FClSURz10VrlXwUJ/ZzESo8YdjufTU3vI+yDczrLxIddxPcuoO9z9fwI+osovCk M8UukpPAyL17+zy7U1uSvUcVouKubxQYvonFk0TRFVNSIoDSdELaToPH4JjcQPloOrJK MxWA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=usUFMvKyG5TpsnYB0NHsBWHlkCXid5uUxZx6vu6SkA4=; b=ibN67jUg1mU6v2H27fXkKHibhJrGPQ8mNkfooXLHF83kR4/oQo+wYLNF/KH8CUZg/H Jh+njL95Oa7Fnh3JkHXFof8J8PqWZFGNouG8S3Lkd/dzmIfrnTi212wvI9QU8ShlG6nU QbfxJUKhC7KOs7ER7jNTgeN3xDbsYANxBjgHivlPQ5FjLDQGJ53oqGzQzHVO7XuH6Uhk QkHydizab0FaOoSkD/HbdoByRZqedwhvsaMC0ugtH0cBxQvwUznSBlqqmkS0xuXgWVml h2Smb2Jij7zD1c0lPIgx3WoPt0LztFTc3NCqo+d78EAwtR/wOk5XgpVLXYQ46qh+y0EN iNLw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXXa+qWlR9SljcwbePUeAtSdzUSmiQE9BTEnk7aQBcFppLHEdKi ZqR/mjOqDMSpj6KMGre+kb02qHNi
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx/p1GkWmhzXgS7uhjyTZ2aPl2DW1V0Uf1x4g4U0rsmiFt9zQo/EBcXwhli6tTF17XVL8SV4g==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:d406:: with SMTP id a6mr5433863pgh.264.1575661117244; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 11:38:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] (228.147.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.147.228]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x11sm16802591pfn.53.2019.12.06.11.38.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 06 Dec 2019 11:38:36 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Popping)
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, ipv6@ietf.org
References: <BN7PR05MB56998A05469327E759B5B671AE5D0@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <3AD3BD11-8C34-41FE-B88F-49A9F2561D78@cisco.com> <BN7PR05MB569946D6AA5C6B78AFC05F6BAE5C0@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <8DEDE597-B7B0-48F5-959E-69757315C2AC@employees.org> <BN7PR05MB56996FFC117F512EEA04AFC8AE5C0@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <4FAB68A3-C533-471D-94D0-3F6EB1F32FC1@employees.org> <1e36a492-5931-02de-cf85-63339522b13a@si6networks.com> <F6DD2C7C-DBBF-4B48-B890-3C86005FB9CF@employees.org> <bb3be82d-8ea7-6c29-ad0a-61b491ee997d@si6networks.com> <8A9BC46E-A018-41C0-BE47-4BABC30EFE79@employees.org> <20191205222740.GA9637@ernw.de> <C7BCB0CF-1CA3-4CA8-9E71-13A013955938@employees.org> <430da027-07a7-42f9-60d0-bbb3f3306222@joelhalpern.com> <4750f9c9-3ffa-3532-bf42-07c2bb60da15@gmail.com> <49596ba2-2a39-c5fe-0b93-76abac44b87a@si6networks.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <fa2d59ca-88f8-006a-d6ec-6d6b25c41189@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2019 08:38:34 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <49596ba2-2a39-c5fe-0b93-76abac44b87a@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/k8yLLn4emr5ZjIeWMrl7AJrq8x0>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2019 19:38:40 -0000

On 07-Dec-19 05:59, Fernando Gont wrote:
> On 6/12/19 12:47, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
>> I would like to mention something.
>>
>> Le 06/12/2019 à 16:09, Joel M. Halpern a écrit :
>>> Ole, there is no IETF accepted definition of "limited domain".
>>
>> There is an I-D about limited domains in general.  
> 
> An I-D is not IETF consensus.

And there will not be IETF consensus on that draft, since we submitted it to
the Independent stream. It's very consciously architectural in nature, but
since the authors aren't in the IAB, the Independent Stream was the only
way to go.

    Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email