Re: Route Information Options in Redirect Messages
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 11 January 2017 02:23 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F62712944A; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 18:23:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kJ-LIR1OGM6x; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 18:23:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22b.google.com (mail-pf0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BFDA1293DF; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 18:23:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id 127so56836054pfg.1; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 18:23:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hXLqjo1IsBo1IkWd5hi/4SyXhHErN+k6tH907hdOVzg=; b=o9I8CXmgPnQDjA8qo0deIEssdT2S1aOwbM8y+3A1dqDHrJsF3nF+tdtUYyLAZKF8Hh zRlskyQ02GiwB/ii8zl+WQvHvNeeHosqlZwZEoDz0LunRL/X/B9uhbCl8FBX6MdnMeDK xMFy9k1pwbHsx2i8EShCzclQsHvBPIGa971t8+6XDEl00LlSuEF78N0A2e6Bs5lj1zHq jQLWkLMW5uu0GYMykelleAl/isxe1G60KolEkXKsDi6VXe9KJvTf+5cOJZdaEAle9Dxm 3bi+Ok5W1HyLZg1a4zMlWgBmx9pzBxJyvhyE/ulJuZTeIOHORZHJlHbE2BpNWXSnD6tq FRZg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hXLqjo1IsBo1IkWd5hi/4SyXhHErN+k6tH907hdOVzg=; b=U38W+ajFvHcmswCVCip802VrrMoGoZA4zi5U8GiSuvQHTQjQVIGIe/CPucoWMFIVrj VuYLNgxTkXil7+NNJnD6tyHdyYmztDZtqd29ulaOuh/uIsH6cE5p03DoZCCBcZt2lqcn V9jdTHEwHdx3pPjSgFjVqmbBObRXN/eWHfsPGMl5/Y4kU6+Rx985x2ZWh7UXP1mPrPGK A5QEu8yzwXcC4e+BGB+/kHR6+Zgd/W5AcYnRLy067Bt9A/px0QfAH9vDQXH2zVDQGlAZ KbTRnBm3eBnvE1hGag64Avq/qtZ8MAJT4B/fCv9Ho7PnUATkrz7+lTkF1+IdTqyUNurU TPYQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIFIdZy1qUdqQw7/5cmbTWGSzrnwh5Kw0xyU3Dyxoi0qUU75CwtZOIdzvfcTGJWrA==
X-Received: by 10.98.91.130 with SMTP id p124mr7299544pfb.173.1484101436729; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 18:23:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:575f:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:575f:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e127sm8682300pfh.89.2017.01.10.18.23.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Jan 2017 18:23:56 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Route Information Options in Redirect Messages
To: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, INT Area <int-area@ietf.org>
References: <b0d15d2e8b3e414abf4e87c60d39e252@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <32fbea25-01c9-aa32-e70f-3e1282f56294@gmail.com> <5cd024891c204a9bb37dcc23796c36c6@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <e6e32b7c-7ff3-d357-92ee-0beecbbf5705@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 15:23:55 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5cd024891c204a9bb37dcc23796c36c6@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/kLWFT9zmyB_wBKPhVt2whowpfQk>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 02:23:58 -0000
On 11/01/2017 06:55, Templin, Fred L wrote: > Hi Brian, > > I am looking at the section that says: > > "3.4. Redirects > There is potential for adverse interaction with any off-link Redirect > (Redirect for a destination that is not on-link) message sent by a > router in accordance with Section 8 of [RFC4861]. Hosts SHOULD apply > off-link redirects only for the specific pair of source and > destination addresses concerned, so the host's Destination Cache > might need to contain appropriate source-specific entries. This > extends the validity check specified in Section 8.1 of [RFC4861]." > > What is being proposed in the document I submitted is the inclusion of > RIOs in Redirect messages for a *prefix* that is not on-link, as opposed > to a singleton destination. So, the same SHOULD in the paragraph above > would seem to apply also to prefix redirection the same as for ordinary > destination redirection. I didn't want to bias your reading, but that was my conclusion too. If correct, maybe your draft needs to cite RFC8028 and augment it accordingly. Regards Brian > > Thanks - Fred > fred.l.templin@boeing.com > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com] >> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 2:08 PM >> To: Templin, Fred L <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>; 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org> >> Subject: Re: Route Information Options in Redirect Messages >> >> Fred, >> >> Can you check that there would be no adverse interaction with RFC8028, >> especially https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8028#section-3.4 >> >> Regards >> Brian >> >> On 10/01/2017 04:51, Templin, Fred L wrote: >>> See below for a new draft that proposes to update RFC4861 and RFC4191 to >>> permit the inclusion of Route Information Options in Redirect Messages. >>> This represents a backward-compatible extension to the IPv6 ND Redirect >>> function. Please review and comment on the list. >>> >>> Fred >>> fred.l.templin@boeing.com >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org >>> Sent: Friday, January 06, 2017 1:52 PM >>> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org >>> Subject: I-D Action: draft-templin-intarea-rio-redirect-00.txt >>> >>> >>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. >>> >>> >>> Title : Route Information Options in Redirect Messages >>> Author : Fred L. Templin >>> Filename : draft-templin-intarea-rio-redirect-00.txt >>> Pages : 5 >>> Date : 2017-01-06 >>> >>> Abstract: >>> The IPv6 Neighbor Discovery protocol provides a Redirect function >>> allowing routers to inform hosts of a better next hop on the link >>> toward the destination. This document specifies a backward- >>> compatible extension to the Redirect function to allow routers to >>> include forwarding information that the source can associate with the >>> next hop. >>> >>> >>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-templin-intarea-rio-redirect/ >>> >>> There's also a htmlized version available at: >>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-templin-intarea-rio-redirect-00 >>> >>> >>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission >>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >>> >>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> I-D-Announce mailing list >>> I-D-Announce@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce >>> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html >>> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt >>> >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list >>> ipv6@ietf.org >>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> . >>> >
- Route Information Options in Redirect Messages Templin, Fred L
- FW: Route Information Options in Redirect Messages Templin, Fred L
- Re: Route Information Options in Redirect Messages james woodyatt
- Re: Route Information Options in Redirect Messages Brian E Carpenter
- RE: [Int-area] Route Information Options in Redir… Templin, Fred L
- RE: Route Information Options in Redirect Messages Templin, Fred L
- RE: [Int-area] Route Information Options in Redir… Christian Huitema
- RE: [Int-area] Route Information Options in Redir… Templin, Fred L
- Re: Route Information Options in Redirect Messages Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Route Information Options in Redirect Messages Templin, Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] Route Information Options in Redir… Zied Bouziri
- RE: [Int-area] Route Information Options in Redir… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] Route Information Options in Redir… Tomoyuki Sahara
- RE: [Int-area] Route Information Options in Redir… Templin, Fred L
- RE: [Int-area] Route Information Options in Redir… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [Int-area] Route Information Options in Redir… sthaug
- Re: [Int-area] Route Information Options in Redir… james woodyatt
- RE: [Int-area] Route Information Options in Redir… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] Route Information Options in Redir… james woodyatt