Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Wed, 25 November 2020 16:06 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22ABE3A1957 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 08:06:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OXjttskGn-ps for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 08:06:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x131.google.com (mail-il1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D6EE3A1956 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 08:06:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x131.google.com with SMTP id a19so2621604ilm.3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 08:06:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=p0OpsEHH6PMYkuQLgUDH1Xs5mtGD1ZWMeJ8A2eMzfwc=; b=pIMPX3gtM+WO/Cy3r8EIwKlZDbV09+oL9EIpNI96YUwl3WiNPd1iAGxgUMsQGRBn85 7AwiAhQTAGrJNhHftzGcrsuPBqTV4YdKcF5dujspX557YXrFQe9MdLHN83i4QnKDQFrs 70xNmgOFoqcQNVS9UJcpp2GWx+upiAnsKVRiICm+tESGmQ9Z7EYLC7qv22mJW7Ag71d2 G1E1/PuKaqYshDMS019clChok/0OWY98rmGdomNF/xc4uNnNgu7kgNvEKTvpgjJDqnIv JjiF/i5XtaU/6K3YZ51996jkAjFBlL1KJmy3qnz7XiKYyIldEr3VGyWEw2VHpElCFdZu URow==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=p0OpsEHH6PMYkuQLgUDH1Xs5mtGD1ZWMeJ8A2eMzfwc=; b=sxxWsm0wa/6NqrAiUF/wPkNf/bVna9vba3zEUFZi1LwlDdAlNxRp6BiUdumhauAG9p VygzdecNi02h7nGlPzhPIgwmOK0stsGAIFi/VuJm7QiS1BqQiXposYO0tE+AvGVtUcR+ W4K1uiKOU7bJygy2dG1V8ibe4VBbs58GNUpHFT9VerlSGJYo1+NF5PA3gpfNrGI54ISk cSOHuzMawTzmHn5OGpZxt45mVwFSU0y37tx7zJsywgLY8OlFGezHHCZ418ABNeJXrng8 /TJh00QUT4p32KNbD1OuxaZ+7E3RtTg1swg0SlCjSqBUPJHLPIZwZHkLpBwXZP3IUaka tAIw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5312pwZ1LOo1TB1ooS5NXsRqJ/qrIw/3AhSYMPH3Tuwl1MisEtM4 LEo8ywKHS5W9SIB9zHCOlV8AWhpsvuiXqsMj4jr5BVNkdwrw8Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwuL/wM6xFzUBToD3yePL97QUYAK1oPsvBkoczY5gVxXmH+cMSahsDL39YI5bP9tSwFGmRaEMPwe0T10gMIUfg=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:f43:: with SMTP id y3mr3430291ilj.187.1606320393046; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 08:06:33 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABNhwV2-dH81CY4wSisV8BU-7H9m5a1xYMqTMecRxhNqZe=ApQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1xV179LZ7Kxtk5mGruJcJ+BpGb2heBBy4ORtRU7bfvqw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMGpriWqnmL0qo0Hm=b+GbzcdCuXz6PM5aq8owE7-=ty5pDFsw@mail.gmail.com> <1DB65027-BEF2-4C0A-ACF4-C979DA7444C2@employees.org> <m1khXWs-00007wC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <47150D97-27D7-4AFD-8418-692D68D09828@employees.org> <m1khXol-0000MEC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <BD254B32-FAAE-4433-9CF5-2AF19275CA96@employees.org> <m1khZLr-0000IXC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <51F56897-AEE2-43E6-8FCC-BD9412B53675@employees.org> <ad4aa2ca83e743fb8d23026a7ad0649b@huawei.com> <1b284a58699e4fa39b1602b8f3fede28@boeing.com> <m1khbrX-0000J8C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
In-Reply-To: <m1khbrX-0000J8C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 01:06:21 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr2AKRqKWDUhZHYhT+1gOsrCG+JFoFZ=j=W0G7e1i51pRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
To: Philip Homburg <pch-ipv6-ietf-6@u-1.phicoh.com>
Cc: IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006cc50f05b4f09ca8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/kUl351nLeBqRwzPvi42rW1yWlBs>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:06:36 -0000

On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 2:13 AM Philip Homburg <
pch-ipv6-ietf-6@u-1.phicoh.com> wrote:

> >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-templin-6man-lla-type/
>
> In my opinion it is a quite broken design to put protocol bits in IPv6
> addresses when ND already has an option syntax for these types of
> extensions.
>

+1, this does seem pretty hacky.