Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-resilient-rs-05: (with COMMENT)

["Stephen Farrell" <[e-mail]>]

Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-6man-resilient-rs-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-resilient-rs/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------


security considerations: I note that RFC 4861 has been
updated, including by RFC 5942, which specifically says it
addresses a security concern in 4861. (I didn't check the
others.) I think it'd be better to say here "beyond those
discussed in [RFC4861] and RFCs that update that" or some
such. Or point to all the relevant ones, or tell me that it
doesn't matter for this:-)