Re: Why one Internet?

Bill Jouris <bill.jouris@insidethestack.com> Tue, 10 April 2012 15:29 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.jouris@insidethestack.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A7FE11E8101 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.501
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_99=3.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AyaxNd+7-+5B for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm14.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm14.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.91.84]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A875211E80FC for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [98.139.91.63] by nm14.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Apr 2012 15:29:48 -0000
Received: from [98.139.44.80] by tm3.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Apr 2012 15:29:48 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1017.access.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Apr 2012 15:29:48 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 44275.52625.bm@omp1017.access.mail.sp2.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 64736 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Apr 2012 15:29:47 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1334071787; bh=X6J7SBK0gpVR3YKbDywMWF8WtEJ2l7PpQKkYgsnaBE8=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Br9tW9BQ0z4vwTZBUnNDcQvX4QZA68r0UvQ+xwhHOeD87qLtZ4PqvfVLltKVLUZY0KYwTrCn3pZBhqtxgX5jG9kzhSmBPXc9TLiwgxQwQs+vgzEZqhW9NjI8k6P+wJZft+73SwYMojTvRZXPZaQwU7QcW9bpzTAYVPVwL6NDQ24=
X-YMail-OSG: yPLdzgAVM1lbsKakAsJf5UiYIYoAJVzckZ0aMSky8NxIj.i nJhIG0SsH6XirqJr4Yp52tPbczB5ZxGAeSAZLQI6KgczGqdyR2a7.DM3KpHU UJ7eObec8Gs9mK6GYi2fT1F.zTGqh2kVWA78rnYFvta_2bvRmL5_4KwSbNwR yjBa1_v2lhbGk1gRZ0n7GyFxhZf6ZhykWzhaiGwjTgqsHA3HqyjvYfLSdUD4 e.37aashUdMdtcZAOGFQrYvgglAEqQup8c0sqmsWhN7IUc4ebvVZPPKdKrFR Qy8KjNvgX4ylhsxLHOtOY16uLUc5CbtD2AvAPr_Xn3aPHO571X4b0ROVfgb8 7m5N4XIkQcakYMBKwlq04WbwIgljlxv24qNEvJvgsF9diulXB9w6IVXbBLjN .WnJyZcN66L6BeAgmvnKxIj.YhvAraN0nDnD698nXHdvymZkdQDRaiDHmCf3 p3cmoU7ewmshpR2vAo9MFz7ys7__fgFNncJPBrSm1NZjIhTRWA5WZuOJpyV6 5_q2Y8C4L1eT14DvmX9wKyMREib0UZn7DJm6MvVDnu8GXYUc-
Received: from [24.23.149.201] by web2817.biz.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:29:47 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/15.0.5 YahooMailWebService/0.8.117.340979
Message-ID: <1334071787.62402.YahooMailClassic@web2817.biz.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:29:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bill Jouris <bill.jouris@insidethestack.com>
Subject: Re: Why one Internet?
To: ipv6@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="186841555-2114570601-1334071787=:62402"
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:29:52 -0000

Why *not* one Internet?  

If someone wants to create multiple ones (or, more accurately, break the existing one into multiple pieces), it seems incumbent on them to make a solid case for doing so.  That is, to show a specific problem, and a technical case why a drastic architectural change is the *only* effective way to address it.

Bill Jouris
Inside Products, Inc.
www.insidethestack.com
831-659-8360
925-855-9512 (direct)