Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses

Jong-Hyouk Lee <jonghyouk@gmail.com> Tue, 27 March 2012 14:16 UTC

Return-Path: <jonghyouk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BA2F21F881B for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:16:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SvR0TtTM59kC for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10DFD21F8817 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:16:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iazz13 with SMTP id z13so11703348iaz.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:16:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=CEn4bkKAXsL2fQiwb0ZcFznPWT8rw6EX28ykWvpgqNw=; b=jRIQJ4qXZu+au02zTRvdWgrAC79xNcU7cv69NjmdWTSJ9tngzIg0K75Hl22tsBUVGq NH1hqEOfiDgInMjm0fgq4CrMjCMAs8Rgu8SdHOdOiGc9EVGF1qHBET0/zLIau1VeGsi6 LzhiWnn9lZUlZRISlHlFx6PGxQfdEBzXq26aIS27eCWR7HuFuR0VCPUUqT6nOHU1EFGP YE51XKAsB85SvAqENKm6zst82PW/IpgK2PEKbxpc197OUi5PsnQnE/zfGM3b4V7ZUB9I ulrJydzP0NDR24SqOBdPt5Vgfp2uTwjyE5/kUVFaZUl2Ed3yHS2Wg7VnryOPECD1owwe 2gBA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.195.131 with SMTP id ie3mr8704135igc.52.1332857805664; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:16:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.30.200 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:16:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4F71C050.3010208@si6networks.com>
References: <4F716D5C.40402@innovationslab.net> <1332844849.2641.800.camel@karl> <4F71C050.3010208@si6networks.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:16:45 +0200
Message-ID: <CAB2CD_Wtyi14GM61hdWmw0c1hcYXC2xRpbLXY6SHro91aLsEWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses
From: Jong-Hyouk Lee <jonghyouk@gmail.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14dae9340fc90af23e04bc3a240f"
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 14:16:47 -0000

Hi, all

To me, the option "A. Prefer public addresses over privacy addresses".

Cheers.

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>wrote:

> On 03/27/2012 12:40 PM, Karl Auer wrote:
> > While I realise that the Argument From Personal Ignorance is not very
> > convincing, I am having a very hard time imagining why anyone would turn
> > on privacy addresses, then prefer non-privacy addresses...
>
> They don't. Some operating systems enable them by default.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Fernando Gont
> SI6 Networks
> e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
> PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>



-- 
RSM Department, TELECOM Bretagne, France
Jong-Hyouk Lee, living somewhere between /dev/null and /dev/random

#email: jonghyouk (at) gmail (dot) com
#webpage: http://sites.google.com/site/hurryon/