Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses
Jong-Hyouk Lee <jonghyouk@gmail.com> Tue, 27 March 2012 14:16 UTC
Return-Path: <jonghyouk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BA2F21F881B for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:16:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SvR0TtTM59kC for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10DFD21F8817 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:16:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iazz13 with SMTP id z13so11703348iaz.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:16:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=CEn4bkKAXsL2fQiwb0ZcFznPWT8rw6EX28ykWvpgqNw=; b=jRIQJ4qXZu+au02zTRvdWgrAC79xNcU7cv69NjmdWTSJ9tngzIg0K75Hl22tsBUVGq NH1hqEOfiDgInMjm0fgq4CrMjCMAs8Rgu8SdHOdOiGc9EVGF1qHBET0/zLIau1VeGsi6 LzhiWnn9lZUlZRISlHlFx6PGxQfdEBzXq26aIS27eCWR7HuFuR0VCPUUqT6nOHU1EFGP YE51XKAsB85SvAqENKm6zst82PW/IpgK2PEKbxpc197OUi5PsnQnE/zfGM3b4V7ZUB9I ulrJydzP0NDR24SqOBdPt5Vgfp2uTwjyE5/kUVFaZUl2Ed3yHS2Wg7VnryOPECD1owwe 2gBA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.195.131 with SMTP id ie3mr8704135igc.52.1332857805664; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:16:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.30.200 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:16:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4F71C050.3010208@si6networks.com>
References: <4F716D5C.40402@innovationslab.net> <1332844849.2641.800.camel@karl> <4F71C050.3010208@si6networks.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:16:45 +0200
Message-ID: <CAB2CD_Wtyi14GM61hdWmw0c1hcYXC2xRpbLXY6SHro91aLsEWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses
From: Jong-Hyouk Lee <jonghyouk@gmail.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14dae9340fc90af23e04bc3a240f"
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 14:16:47 -0000
Hi, all To me, the option "A. Prefer public addresses over privacy addresses". Cheers. On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>wrote: > On 03/27/2012 12:40 PM, Karl Auer wrote: > > While I realise that the Argument From Personal Ignorance is not very > > convincing, I am having a very hard time imagining why anyone would turn > > on privacy addresses, then prefer non-privacy addresses... > > They don't. Some operating systems enable them by default. > > Thanks, > -- > Fernando Gont > SI6 Networks > e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com > PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- RSM Department, TELECOM Bretagne, France Jong-Hyouk Lee, living somewhere between /dev/null and /dev/random #email: jonghyouk (at) gmail (dot) com #webpage: http://sites.google.com/site/hurryon/
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Jong-Hyouk Lee
- 3484bis and privacy addresses Brian Haberman
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Arifumi Matsumoto
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Teemu Savolainen
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Francis Dupont
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Mohacsi Janos
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Tim Chown
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Roland Bless
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Samita Chakrabarti
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Simon Perreault
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Alex Abrahams
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Tina TSOU
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Wuyts Carl
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Karl Auer
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Karl Auer
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Fernando Gont
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Francis Dupont
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Fernando Gont
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Brian Haberman
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Fernando Gont
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Ray Hunter
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Fernando Gont
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Ray Hunter
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Sander Steffann
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Dominik Elsbroek
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Karl Auer
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses STARK, BARBARA H
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Karl Auer
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Brian E Carpenter
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Roger Jørgensen
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Francis Dupont
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses jonne.soininen
- Re: Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Ray Hunter
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Doug Barton
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses t.petch
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Alex Abrahams
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Doug Barton
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Mark Andrews
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Fernando Gont
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Dave Thaler
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Ray Hunter
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses james woodyatt
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Ray Hunter
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Dave Thaler
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Brian E Carpenter
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Dave Thaler
- Re: RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Ray Hunter
- RE: RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Dave Thaler
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Ray Hunter
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Dave Thaler
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Ray Hunter
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Dave Thaler
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Dave Thaler
- Re: RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Ray Hunter
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Arifumi Matsumoto