IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-00.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 09 July 2021 21:10 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D903A2F11 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 14:10:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.437
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.338, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XzCGm7HemcXs for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 14:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62c.google.com (mail-pl1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B6A13A2F0E for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 14:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id h1so5674916plf.6 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 14:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gfNE8lKedKXwvsPR7iLxKqC2UEL+hgzy8qAbXFUw4E0=; b=TpJ1QVGCpxErYTalJB0rMpc3yzDqjLILTt6eKOykBX4DIEDEpPX/VEYQ/rS1N1V1m+ Z7UPBgyXCvJzDcYw++GlZpun/xgQmBT41M+zlnDBn1aAO5gCBp2CAltJ47iQR4kzAhG8 1AdMYKSk5kPolGBES8vF5HLHSRmpcOctqx9hNzlSCqQ7Wnzh9E2KpW2QP585lb85DoZb rUQSLLKYtiIloseA3QIjpGD8rjXA1DqpGeu6eJGWweoSnDtVWzfd+CuzGiBGc67+ME43 9OML5gLyPdzfQ7cHIt7JxL0/yZ0MzEX6JV8xOtTDBZ4WoeD5ChgnPzjg8y3N7wylMjZ7 a3Ng==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gfNE8lKedKXwvsPR7iLxKqC2UEL+hgzy8qAbXFUw4E0=; b=NkBKs37Ng3kBg4FTpnQ5slG6cCufUXbZzsxS3ejW0y2rfrImD/qO132Yjc/8pUGn++ 7byzoMHDBkJ+xMAzDLvVg4UJDzXU/DIsZO6LnKe/0LrN70VJljF76+s/JY1XWHGLC2kj ahstZSa1ykI4DlFGuamL6jbbmx9uRvQtZuWss7C2UR6dqkt1FutWjPdto7dZXq9/dKPi MZBGcQ/1OxtqRhQK0CU5wjgMji19MJ2ycQNCwKCOQZAuiapAg9MH/i7X+tzfnSRiA27m i4W1EVlR+06WNrwt+A3sBmcVe/r6AXyKhi2YmZONwq1ZKwiqtLQC7/k1QJOG4ZB3slLg 1lSA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530dHub7+LXaISNhIPY4OBRgC06raQEjprIOtfYEQpORuQ6kmEnj 6CL8QSx23m/bMVxjDm3Da1FAohSnhmvLow==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJymlp1xD+tCb29mwvrR1lsMMQyhZdD1vCuqP0AdJqJ+QOa180X9/zSm3IprDfRhV58/kofnGQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:aa0a:b029:128:c224:4f0a with SMTP id be10-20020a170902aa0ab0290128c2244f0amr32515547plb.58.1625865024942; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 14:10:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:1188:5b01:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:1188:5b01:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s20sm13184237pji.19.2021.07.09.14.10.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 09 Jul 2021 14:10:24 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-00.txt
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Philip Homburg <pch-ipv6-ietf-7@u-1.phicoh.com>, ipv6@ietf.org
References: <162545101341.19246.8566193740265797873@ietfa.amsl.com> <95a7dbe5-e0a3-4676-9dcc-005ff53725e0@gmail.com> <CA+9kkMD3iSgo-KMM5Ed8bVnVCu_G3f2kB6zHKoOx2ta=x8QucA@mail.gmail.com> <CANMZLAbmdWHDRBPpHgy_e4_0-WUVW2gjnbXWwu2pF_xi-S0vWQ@mail.gmail.com> <87a6n13y0j.fsf@ungleich.ch> <CA+9kkMBx4F0FGZasdk11ogyCOwQZecAEkO4JbECDr4osySN-4w@mail.gmail.com> <01289d8c-a470-1867-448f-3d616647ba5f@gmail.com> <87bl7flww8.fsf@ungleich.ch> <6771.1625578366@localhost> <m1m19WD-0000EXC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <e90a069c-873f-6c93-29f0-b69c9430b66b@gmail.com> <m1m1Qie-0000FLC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <26758.1625758150@localhost> <54c7739a-6fb6-7e20-7b9f-3c1a8b6a613b@gmail.com> <11473.1625790920@localhost> <967177aa-a740-72b6-e0e5-32fc62d27831@gmail.com> <7697.1625850036@localhost>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <282fc0e8-10db-4c86-7483-87b4b0ff5ee8@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2021 09:10:19 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7697.1625850036@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/lMBnfamlDvjZ7jBbjfw2GlxTlLY>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2021 21:10:29 -0000

On 10-Jul-21 05:00, Michael Richardson wrote:
> 
> Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>     >> So, how is working even though you have one non-loopback interface?
> 
> Er, I mispoke.  More than one non-loopback interface.
> 
>     > I'm not sure I understand that question. As far as I can tell, there is
>     > no named interface in Windows that fulfills the function of 'lo' in
>     > Linux.  So I'm guessing it's special-cased in the code, but somebody at
>     > Microsoft knows the answer.
> 
> Really, no loopback?  What is ::1 attached to?

A mystery to me... amusingly enough, Windows allows this:

C:\WINDOWS\system32>ping ::1%0

Pinging ::1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from ::1: time<1ms

so I guess interface 0 is the loopback, but it is listed nowhere as such.

>     > Anyway... Wireshark tells me that the ping is going out on the Ethernet
>     > interface, which is %7, rather than WiFi, which is %23. So Windows
>     > picks Ethernet when given the choice.
> 
> I thought it would only work when you had one (active) interface.

Clearly they don't mimic the Unix/Linux model.

   Brian

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status