Re: Objection to draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt - /63 and /65 RAs on linux

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Thu, 02 March 2017 12:46 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7BF9120727 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 04:46:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XywZSLVpOncV for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 04:46:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 737E7129989 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 04:46:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 6BCC3A6; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 13:46:12 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1488458772; bh=1xZ6JIjnmHKJVL09RAAmV0AbGqUUnCkN5gz3FQMO6pQ=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Pl4Q1APCMNShjst1F8Vze86Dojvai/Z03lsbq7EL3wt/qU4pAtm6bTvjYphPxbIC5 I7MrVM7SmV/rhpbDkHf+YaCxAtA0L4X/plyMO8SLJXHYGIW6s5oAh7rELaQgrFTmxd PxM8rSSSzu6sCwCzGjot6mekaDeMIKTSwx/b0His=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667B5A5; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 13:46:12 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 13:46:12 +0100 (CET)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Objection to draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt - /63 and /65 RAs on linux
In-Reply-To: <63d98caf-ab70-088f-ff6b-ad27a11619e0@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1703021342350.30226@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <20170223134026.GI5069@gir.theapt.org> <CAN-Dau1vJV5O_Ythp6THkAu4-YZXV82Upny1V+ybbjCVZQQX=A@mail.gmail.com> <27cce319-18ac-5c0e-3497-af92344f0062@gmail.com> <de4988be-6031-08d9-84ce-21c3fa4f9bc9@gmail.com> <98401ef7-cf41-b4a0-4d11-a7d840181bd0@gmail.com> <1047f5fc-ae40-be52-6bab-27f31fe5e045@gmail.com> <9a94feac-8d59-b153-d41c-04fc371e4db4@gmail.com> <CAO42Z2z7v4gDk91b6Of-1sczV88m3B9kzn0MeJU_VBJ416k6Ww@mail.gmail.com> <ae35b45a-0398-840f-fc0d-1f64dd2fcc58@gmail.com> <37851ee3-03be-8bee-6190-f4d28df86305@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1703012051590.30226@uplift.swm.pp.se> <b5784622-c24e-a531-4e68-249b03701941@gmail.com> <CAAedzxrSTFe0GgYuvtXPNE=R_ZCXotxL7HbKdj5A4-869rncmw@mail.gmail.com> <ba025be6-709d-87b4-f388-d6f143408277@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1703021029010.30226@uplift.swm.pp.se> <4e17a9f4-6daf-787f-0321-3327fe601d70@gmail.com> <bead3cd8-f7f9-37b3-66f9-e76ae94056d1@baanhofman.nl> <63d98caf-ab70-088f-ff6b-ad27a11619e0@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/m27c-MwfuxA5YJpyW0YBYnISE5Q>
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 12:46:15 -0000

On Thu, 2 Mar 2017, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:

> Yes.  For more precision - correct _only_ for the 802.3 case (IPv6 over 
> Ethernet).  Because we dont have an IPv6-over-WiFi either (802.11).

We have IPv6 for 802.1 framed networks (that was my understanding). Both 
802.3 and 802.11 uses ethernet frames, so why wouldn't they be considered 
the same from L3 IPv6 point of view?

That's the way it's been done historically anyway, as far as I can see.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se