draft-gont-6man-oversized-header-chain-02

RJ Atkinson <rja.lists@gmail.com> Wed, 13 June 2012 14:12 UTC

Return-Path: <rja.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2538421F84E1 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 07:12:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eB8VByG7JGfm for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 07:12:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-f49.google.com (mail-qa0-f49.google.com [209.85.216.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E11C21F84DF for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 07:12:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qabj40 with SMTP id j40so1357321qab.15 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 07:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=5BProXAVSK79RrSjxYjwt6VPO6Fi0Xxgpuc2IDu34iI=; b=iqzQbUuR7LYAXq4x/djPLD0PDTp8aZFp5WPVJqEpp5C077Vv2f5E8HWnGPnoMfheAc nJyIG9zcRDj8UyEUPThK5LAuuJmHknqUX18EVaiOsiykrWRZ1jX+Keh8p2UHoaGUOfJN fhN87cr5l0cvSCELWyd7t7wjL7cuDP7b9n1dQPqa0SiCKvi1VeVBKNhy9od9E6WIaivt 33DuoFyNrktInH65YasDDnUareYNEeerX/lWBjJF4k78HUxx8cSdNVxPR/rof7OhTPlz pZp59iMtGZEsiBA1HfTTRNQwcPF7eRqG1AH+Q6fYVbLlTdYmf+NVOqSPGi5kZgOx79+/ WYxQ==
Received: by 10.229.137.11 with SMTP id u11mr10611899qct.44.1339596766674; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 07:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.30.20.11] (pool-96-225-134-175.nrflva.fios.verizon.net. [96.225.134.175]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ej2sm9788798qab.7.2012.06.13.07.12.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 13 Jun 2012 07:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: RJ Atkinson <rja.lists@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: draft-gont-6man-oversized-header-chain-02
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 10:12:46 -0400
Message-Id: <400B0A44-BBB5-4F43-97F3-9518AC1E78C1@gmail.com>
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:12:50 -0000

Hi,

I support the 6MAN WG adopting this document -- and also the 
closely related draft-gont-6man-nd-extension-headers document.  

The proposals in these two documents are closely related to 
current work in IPv6 Ops WG to create an IETF specification 
for an IPv6 Router Advertisement (RA) Guard function.

My understanding is that the next revision of the RA Guard
draft will cite these two document normatively.

It would be very helpful if folks could read these two 
documents soon, so the 6MAN WG is able to consider the 
proposed specification changes inside these documents soon.

Yours,

Ran Atkinson