IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our processes (Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Popping)

otroan@employees.org Fri, 06 December 2019 20:16 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C7501200CD; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 12:16:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E9jA9j-5EtVE; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 12:16:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clarinet.employees.org (clarinet.employees.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01FE112006D; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 12:16:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from astfgl.hanazo.no (unknown [IPv6:2a01:79c:cebd:47d8:c8b:f971:52ca:e1ba]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clarinet.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 491E54E11AF5; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 20:16:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by astfgl.hanazo.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69D78252AAE5; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 21:16:34 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3601.0.10\))
Subject: Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our processes (Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Popping)
From: otroan@employees.org
In-Reply-To: <BN7PR05MB569934D9DB90CE8783DC2A18AE5F0@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2019 21:16:34 +0100
Cc: Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>, Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>, SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>, 6man <6man@ietf.org>, "int-ads@ietf.org" <int-ads@ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, rtg-ads <rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <21C2AB7C-7134-4CCA-B213-3844014A7DB4@employees.org>
References: <BN7PR05MB5699EA5F4C041538560282A6AE5F0@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <52132FA9-669E-4B32-BDC8-6F06C98315F3@gmail.com> <CALx6S37r2JYbrMpN-qR3bD3kaOMj3xEceQC5JhVb8dqVzfq=5A@mail.gmail.com> <06B50938-0FC6-4901-9531-CC0385185F13@employees.org> <CALx6S35Y0LgwHzBawJUQEyYcRULgSVsRLCW0f35aqsrjX5QasA@mail.gmail.com> <1CEE1555-3D12-4998-9C69-23757649E908@employees.org> <22D9177B-033C-4657-96BA-FC6579918507@liquidtelecom.com> <CCBD1E90-D36D-42A8-8097-1CD8AC02A8C2@employees.org> <BN7PR05MB569934D9DB90CE8783DC2A18AE5F0@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3601.0.10)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/mAo88KT7lDDPJ2KMSJdBoi5PWbY>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2019 20:16:40 -0000

Hi Ron,

> I am not quite sure how to take this email. Are you suggesting that we should review less, post less, and let the rubber stamping begin?

No, not at all. And if it was open for that interpretation I am sorry.
But there are a should's all of us could improve on.
- not repeat the same argument again and again
- think twice before sending another email (yes, I know I have failed terribly today)
- contribute positively, and contribute to document text
- try to find consensus with our opponents
- ...

> Since you have named me, personally, are you suggesting that my contributions have been less than helpful.

No, of course not. A list of top ten posters in the last 30 days does of course not give any indication of quality of contribution.
And the only thing that statistics says is that within the last 30 days you are ranked 5th in the number of messages you have sent.
(Not that I think we would want to or could measure such a thing.)

112 of 162 messages in the last 30 days are sent by the top ten posters.
Most of them are on one side of the EH insertion argument.

With regards to Andrew's comment, draw your own conclusion.

Best regards,
Ole

PS: To take my own advice, believing that I have made my points too many times already, I will try my best to avoid any further postings on this subject.
Have a nice weekend.




> 
>                                                                                                 Ron
>                                                                                                  (fairly upset)
> 
> 
> Juniper Business Use Only
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: otroan@employees.org <otroan@employees.org> 
> Sent: Friday, December 6, 2019 2:42 PM
> To: Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>
> Cc: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>; Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>; SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>; 6man <6man@ietf.org>; int-ads@ietf.org; Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>; rtg-ads <rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org>; Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
> Subject: Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our processes (Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Popping)
> 
> 
>> While I may agree with you that is an attack on process here – and you may even find consensus on that statement – I am far from convinced you would find consensus on the question of which group is conducting the attack on process.
> 
> From https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/?qdr=m&so=frm__;!8WoA6RjC81c!S6FKrq2Xdn2_T2g0140QWYsg_JFo3VitTbn1Jsdnz7Hvh5mRgNDATSSm3OJBQ82k$ 
> 
> The last month's 10 top posters are:
> Fernando: 25
> Ole:      17 (including this message :-))
> Bob:      12
> Brian:    11
> Ron:      10
> Tom:       9
> Gyan:      8
> Sander:    8
> Andrew:    7
> Enno:      6
> 
> Ole
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email