Re: [v6ops] Scope of Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-6man-ipv6-ula-scope-00.txt)

Philip Homburg <pch-ipv6-ietf-7@u-1.phicoh.com> Thu, 07 January 2021 21:40 UTC

Return-Path: <pch-b9D3CB0F5@u-1.phicoh.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE98E3A00E5; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 13:40:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.918
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.918 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4dPDieXJZfGz; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 13:40:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (stereo.hq.phicoh.net [130.37.15.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 159883A00E0; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 13:40:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (localhost [::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by stereo.hq.phicoh.net with esmtp (TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305) (Smail #157) id m1kxd1U-0000EhC; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 22:40:48 +0100
Message-Id: <m1kxd1U-0000EhC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Cc: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Scope of Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-6man-ipv6-ula-scope-00.txt)
From: Philip Homburg <pch-ipv6-ietf-7@u-1.phicoh.com>
Sender: pch-b9D3CB0F5@u-1.phicoh.com
References: <160989494094.6024.7402128068704112703@ietfa.amsl.com> <6fe3a45e-de65-9f88-808d-ea7e2abdcd16@si6networks.com> <CAO42Z2wR-3vbHi-NrBBMmCTNDq5fgqvSmBUbYK7P+63QTNfxkg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr014PzVJj9Y6O=PBGc_QSVtur-0wMpaNkFA0dqr8FHGuA@mail.gmail.com> <44e7ac61-523a-d35e-9024-7e6df81e4226@gmail.com> <be92f523-eeaa-8ed4-afdf-4a537f53748c@si6networks.com> <CAN-Dau2S9pXYAwrRbfT9aMyXPw-NYaOxKF+nXRg_14zqTr8F0g@mail.gmail.com> <m1kxTpt-0000CxC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <2faf76fd-1393-5bc5-52bf-9ee4ba3167a8@gmail.com> <CAO42Z2xBhipQJxX7aauHO7-Y+d0bUhdAxM2OcBxWWi1pGPJ=Vg@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 8 Jan 2021 08:22:38 +1100 ." <CAO42Z2xBhipQJxX7aauHO7-Y+d0bUhdAxM2OcBxWWi1pGPJ=Vg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 22:40:48 +0100
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/mE5rknBu3m3Df1ndP4Xv82yEpfI>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 21:40:54 -0000

>While I do agree that interface ID is much more closer to the truth, it
>seems that one reason for zone rather than interface ID for link-locals in
>RFC 4007 was to inform a multi-interface node that it had multiple
>interfaces attached to the same link, informing it that the corresponding
>interface link-local addresses are attached to the same link.

Are there any implementation that do this? And in particular how does
that work with the socket interface? I.e., with if_nametoindex and
if_indextoname.