IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header issues

David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie> Fri, 27 April 2007 09:26 UTC

Return-path: <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HhMj6-0002oo-2q; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:26:52 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HhMj4-0002oW-Fp for ipv6@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:26:50 -0400
Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie ([2001:770:10:300::86e2:510b]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HhMj1-0004Aw-W6 for ipv6@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:26:50 -0400
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:26:45 +0100
From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>
To: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
Message-ID: <20070427092645.GA16970@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
References: <20070425082408.GB73965@Space.Net> <ec091ee63209add27eb5fa7ac883049c@localhost> <20070425101001.GH73965@Space.Net> <CA7D9B4A761066448304A6AFC09ABDA9015AD161@XCH-NE-1V2.ne.nos.boeing.com> <017501c78855$84a6f380$8df4da80$@net> <m2ps5qsk1y.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> <ygvn8xcechny.fsf@ukse-xdm1.cisco.com> <4631C005.2000609@spaghetti.zurich.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4631C005.2000609@spaghetti.zurich.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--)
X-Scan-Signature: 7bac9cb154eb5790ae3b2913587a40de
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header issues
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group \(ipv6\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org

On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 10:19:01AM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> This 'problem' can be solved with looking glass websites, not which such
> an obvious security problem as RH0.

Surely the number of looking glass websites are a clear sign of a
difficency in IPv4? (Also, having to parse input to web pages and
pass information to command line tools has had more than its fair
share of security problems ;-)

	David

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email