IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Mon, 23 July 2012 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C0121F842B; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:29:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.048, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dqj8ag3ZxlYq; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gh0-f172.google.com (mail-gh0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431B621F841E; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ghbg16 with SMTP id g16so6418055ghb.31 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=i5ECtGMAeDi6OUydL+NpbkT76uXtMK60DUqNDvYEWDA=; b=QTgTNdlxqQbq8LqHs+U1Jg9n5v0+jR9qZ4RhED5kb569p+mvV1n+lgEWcMTQx1ZnvB uo23t8sg/FD77RmOJ+5KKJevQ1i0XiLfmQNSbDnTul9J6hYgnfLsmHPCb6+nnEWya462 tx2TF8HyPOwxxO3uDFhGmsAfX2G+YmrBzHAJHBj5Yd3Iahw56WIyxWR1Knf7gMgYj8qI 9TvkULlC7Kjefw/MoDwFEbMdq4ji5ovCgqczPaeJH7jaYB2iHJhOuDFn4fkJ+MFCZSqn sWkQMNczbJeHkeC8V43/KIM/k3ULm7qIbu4HWjcvQaXItuznSsqa2oXH+1PvMjqoULix vfXA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.201.161 with SMTP id b21mr8316764yho.41.1343071793787; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.207.167 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAM+vMER99GCOuFi_tS=7OxawecEz+sHx-10J=kdzta4o3OeNoA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4FF696AA.3050508@tut.fi> <CAM+vMER0zBfS85QHEuhS1eS_3FZDwXSKdhaFHnEgvecAFiYZ8A@mail.gmail.com> <500B5A2D.6000408@tut.fi> <CAM+vMER99GCOuFi_tS=7OxawecEz+sHx-10J=kdzta4o3OeNoA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:29:53 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC8QAceX394Z0k+5tnUK33cSmMr0uX2X12HhY2-oD1sJe_sQNA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
To: GangChen <phdgang@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: Aleksi Suhonen <Aleksi.Suhonen@tut.fi>, v6ops <v6ops@ietf.org>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:29:55 -0000

>
> Please take a look at Page13~22 at
> http://fud.no/talks/20120417-RIPE64-The_Case_for_IPv6_Only_Data_Centres.pdf
>
> If a stateless translator maintains the binding information of
> *src.IPv6->src.IPv4 address*, the essential feature of "Does not
> require flows to flow bidirectionally across a single translator"
> would lose.
>

Exactly.

I now understood what is meant by Stateless NAT64 reading the above
presentation. It solves the reverse problem of IPv4-only client
talking to IPv6-only server.

Regards,

Behcet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email