Re: ICMP6 redirect

Karl Auer <kauer@biplane.com.au> Tue, 24 July 2012 04:09 UTC

Return-Path: <kauer@biplane.com.au>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8919711E8118 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 21:09:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_21=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ynsQuct7g0sS for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 21:09:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:2:7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913B111E8114 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 21:09:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApIBAJAeDlCWZX+7/2dsb2JhbAANOIVwtyQBAQEEI2YLGCoCAlcZsHZukwOPIoIKgRIDoFaHcQ
Received: from eth4284.nsw.adsl.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.200]) ([150.101.127.187]) by ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 24 Jul 2012 13:39:24 +0930
Subject: Re: ICMP6 redirect
From: Karl Auer <kauer@biplane.com.au>
To: ipv6@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CD189A44-4258-42D9-81AB-28296A7BC4C1@gmail.com>
References: <CD189A44-4258-42D9-81AB-28296A7BC4C1@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-gcTs9pBnjS4XratpMhC6"
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 14:09:21 +1000
Message-ID: <1343102961.2796.241.camel@karl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 04:09:27 -0000

On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 15:46 +1200, Andrew McGregor wrote:
> Unfortunately, there is no way that a router can reliably generate
> that response, if it has more than one link-local address

Do you mean "has more than one link-local address" or "has more than one
link-local address on the receiving interface"?

Regards,K.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Karl Auer (kauer@biplane.com.au)
http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer
http://www.biplane.com.au/blog

GPG fingerprint: AE1D 4868 6420 AD9A A698 5251 1699 7B78 4EEE 6017
Old fingerprint: DA41 51B1 1481 16E1 F7E2 B2E9 3007 14ED 5736 F687