IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Consensus call on adopting: <draft-gont-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-01>

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Fri, 11 May 2012 20:16 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D64EA21F872A for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 May 2012 13:16:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VG1LevqSUw6C for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 May 2012 13:16:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E2D21F86F3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 May 2012 13:16:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rair.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1SSwG8-000PDW-BO; Fri, 11 May 2012 20:16:16 +0000
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 10:16:15 -1000
Message-ID: <m2sjf6mq28.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Consensus call on adopting: <draft-gont-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-01>
In-Reply-To: <3646A828-DD8F-4A2C-B8F3-B9DE2FB4771D@gmail.com>
References: <E7607B61-9889-43A9-B86B-133BD4238BA2@gmail.com> <60CF6942-0D99-422A-8BEB-87A98B7F233D@employees.org> <4FAB02D5.9090300@gont.com.ar> <C2475E14-3A32-4A2F-839B-A61497E43B3C@gmail.com> <m2likzph8e.wl%randy@psg.com> <3646A828-DD8F-4A2C-B8F3-B9DE2FB4771D@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: 6man Chairs <6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, IPv6 WG Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>, Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>, draft-gont-6man-stable-privacy-addresses@tools.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 20:16:22 -0000

>> i beg to differ.  i have used the restrictive clause for years exactly
>> as fernando states.  if the wg does not adopt, then i may take *my*
>> marbles and go home.
> Thanks for saying it so clearly.  I choose to not do that as do many
> others.  I allow my contributions to be used by others in the IETF
> process.

_in the ietf process_ i too allow other to use the works.  but it ain't
in the ietf process unless the wg adopts it.  which is when i change the
clause.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email