Re: CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRH

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 21 May 2020 22:52 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C52973A0C86; Thu, 21 May 2020 15:52:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rtj0-U_k__2w; Thu, 21 May 2020 15:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1034.google.com (mail-pj1-x1034.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1034]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 615733A0C7D; Thu, 21 May 2020 15:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1034.google.com with SMTP id ci23so4084679pjb.5; Thu, 21 May 2020 15:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PwPKZQtL3g9ie+fh7rmHSHAGtPRYBlgdXIwMXkMrb+4=; b=T75flh//DU3EK631SfwY7obQGhL2KlvnGhHEJE6efwACE6Uij3XuDBjv8fs/T6Iu1Z tOtS/NbPGg+ygBATy+budcJu0l0dpy12EWtuW1fUQ7mojC+fey+b+8UwlJChXHAZjYeI 8UGwncUZ22W3fxbdaNq2XjJLRCp6vHuFI0lVfnNrhPGVpGNVv4IeW/NS4794TLmMHanK QND8mbVhMEbrhMrPUN7dQGpJ6GDPhb9fpmGu0FiVWlueQvSRFcXqzHY/iqEC901Gi4Hj i/+L+zAHaMFjhaa8VRPfE69jDYF7ioSsQ0JkrM/NoLTtH2+L1zkGXljLyRzOCSns3uJC P4Yg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=PwPKZQtL3g9ie+fh7rmHSHAGtPRYBlgdXIwMXkMrb+4=; b=uFNFOQwi0DbMqq3ReUJc83SowzbtB8AOwmsNKkO2cDgdirdzoawSvv+Xpo+5pMr4TO lS05TZotlIlF8fEjX1hQJHgDxWPEuS7K0WySSwKuvAFpCawovXzTHaiWB0Wqkfl5Jt3D NIz/uiOHfHAaJh3aDsLrC5web3/J5yojkE3okqtdq2HK9xBpbbOpgsDUYgceczaEW248 DO8lzBv6jJ7fUJoDx3MAJirgA+E8/F0iDkrt4nPZ2ogIvKiSHrOlc+mnEbmlCx7wakpm oa9M7HJavEYJRRpSGafCkvE4RrfvbwD03dj9dDwcykzXylruW1c4HnUv8OJSIF/091A4 frGw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532S/03IDw7ZWRC9mHwFXlaPajx2XioIKJ97J9cx1/lTxIrYO6T2 wWtwcNFumb/BZfnuiSin9Jz/xv1j
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyomA7X5EpRC+QY1emVJiwdPt9OsVGnSahEdQaGs6P1vLKVR8KEtxMW25uehJkGc1LkG9Pd0w==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:aa43:: with SMTP id c3mr11950540plr.7.1590101552583; Thu, 21 May 2020 15:52:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] ([165.84.12.178]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w7sm5139303pfw.82.2020.05.21.15.52.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 21 May 2020 15:52:31 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRH
To: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Cc: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, 6man <6man@ietf.org>
References: <9CF68CCE-B584-4648-84DA-F2DBEA94622D@cisco.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <28abcf26-b124-95de-6409-6696b1d988b1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 10:52:26 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9CF68CCE-B584-4648-84DA-F2DBEA94622D@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/n5JAxwa4dL7iQY_nEr0YtBrbS3g>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 22:52:35 -0000

On 22-May-20 03:35, Zafar Ali (zali) wrote:
...
> There is a clear need for documenting a genuine use-case & architecture for CRH beyond SPRING, before adoption.

Why? We are only deciding whether to pass editorial control of the draft to the WG. If the WG wants to add text about the use cases and architecture to the draft, we can do so in due course. It isn't a pre-condition for adoption.

   Brian