Re: [v6ops] Stateful SLAAC (draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host)

james woodyatt <jhw@google.com> Tue, 14 November 2017 01:49 UTC

Return-Path: <jhw@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5604129576 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:49:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vepk5S__RWgr for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:49:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x22e.google.com (mail-io0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E1CF127275 for <6man@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:49:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 134so22775743ioo.0 for <6man@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:49:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=b0KMplj64MK/WNYFc9gkezl5Xoj3h9sQzYxRNnbzhYw=; b=OrVpz+zMr49vP37JBYljx4fg2im5pFBTyrtetBIXwpJgCZOmk0905G1lJic5VgnNlb 72BxSgyGViEaSxN7eh8jsimfNnXvfR4y0cQZ4RSwyAppxTJX16lV0bKnbg9V6+r7GzRQ +hefxz8dr8GZugUvFAWSUhApnz7tfpMHg2yGOfyEormDJHK6POUlSyTHa6J/VN89I5vJ A7VlOE/hvCyTHdpNYIdh5ZHl78V0+gehSl9Tat1OljLEjICRMAwFTQjg+X05xFKBT2Ra xhNtCrq+dJmo9X0sc1AlmfZfdu8hV0mCdwrKLNow+wqiBepflMr8m9wvFDvo5d18xwqT XJVw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=b0KMplj64MK/WNYFc9gkezl5Xoj3h9sQzYxRNnbzhYw=; b=IyjWkPOv0tTVRwiyCKLnIH3UfbkUH13lzL492+QuyNZeuKt/dQsT/hz3Yxm6ayYG0W XV/Dc7y4muxO/6DGIoPQrMyB6bFjjFQT3S+yDJhI9iYi9IoowujCJye/7eVM2IoBzO7G IiKxFUHfdtkolhl9P+HnYFt6wFYEVCtd3Ls0TuHXpxduG90japERG46QdsCO2oxahqlG uK5TK+eqodWmWnwU20Ng3W+Gripo3M9T54Vw5Q9hVtE9+2DIWWuywmhlla0gXH7GaUSM Rpps8ysz/zMX8DxNwXhlxZ4tVjZzuZIp8+qxNorWSIgspiQa9QNjTh2nuTl4kBZB3ipL kqAQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX5SCC1hj+lDNeMbMkAeeJ/okdqZB8yFhUn+hLtQ6YlgBKeh3crC OQRVmnswi8+5BWkntukijw3p3g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMY2xyL/6YLWVuGVohI1fCBWtzjHFtH+gEHwRhlhfCb3vNPCBkwEOusZ2y668kiPrL4kkCnJVw==
X-Received: by 10.107.200.207 with SMTP id y198mr13259073iof.157.1510624166922; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:49:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-100-99-229-233.pao.corp.google.com ([100.99.229.233]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d1sm3255050ioc.61.2017.11.13.17.49.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:49:26 -0800 (PST)
From: james woodyatt <jhw@google.com>
Message-Id: <A6E27AD3-7F54-46FB-867F-BC43E050854B@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9D111570-4A7A-4A7C-A60F-63B668F712DD"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Stateful SLAAC (draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host)
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:49:24 -0800
In-Reply-To: <72ECE18B-5247-4D00-AF4C-763881929DD3@fugue.com>
Cc: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-8@u-1.phicoh.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
References: <be9724f5-2ff5-d90c-2749-ecae2c628b78@si6networks.com> <0b45890d-ea4a-47b8-a650-ceb72b066df8@gmail.com> <ea772bfd-4004-7f94-8469-b50e3aff0f29@si6networks.com> <F2330138-6842-4C38-B5A0-FB40BFACD038@employees.org> <e40697ca-8017-c9d2-c25d-89087046c9cf@gmail.com> <207f040a-7fe2-9434-e7a5-f546b26fdf63@strayalpha.com> <CAKD1Yr26NK2osApYZBm8Yd=0X7xcetrxojp6=JHOEAu9BB0q8A@mail.gmail.com> <8ca59610-2d25-2be4-9d2c-9b1a75fd3ace@si6networks.com> <E67105A3-396B-403C-B741-E9E01CFB5CE7@employees.org> <e7ec4633-8d45-1cff-ce37-48dafd488e13@si6networks.com> <BBAB48C0-384B-4380-9359-7965C7C61D58@employees.org> <4b7e8e53-ea7a-f84d-92cf-a9a113c200ce@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr1NG93Jv7E6hKY4BKApwJg6uG0wAgUL74cw1Fb5VsKnUg@mail.gmail.com> <14d489ec-0b28-8fe5-e28c-35a1f4fc15de@si6networks.com> <CAJc3aaPb8vOxfUVk-6sQNGpftegPCgb+j3OyGD55rmCado+VZw@mail.gmail.com> <a4a380b0-d69c-1c2c-fedc-0a3da2a8060a@si6networks.com> <CAJc3aaPg=qOpiwJ29Bq92m2RfZ-VDJtLWb-GgZV7bXP6iELiRA@mail.gmail.com> <d86e4678-7634 -5574-3151-056fe92602aa@si6networks.com> <CAJc3aaMKnB8BjHHOqAA3Fj+Ue8KtoW7kPwQLOHu93vivA4Lugg@mail.gmail.com> <m1eEGU6-0000GEC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <72ECE18B-5247-4D00-AF4C-763881929DD3@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/n7ZvA9gXMzd8orXbn6EdJNaJynM>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 01:49:31 -0000

On Nov 13, 2017, at 17:40, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>; wrote:
> 
> Also, it is not true that there is no pushback when new options are proposed for RA.


I have a pile of rejections, none of which were duplicates of DHCPv6. One of them was eventually obsoleted by PCP. Another probably gets replaced by a mess of security vulnerabilities (but at least ND6 will remain pure!).


--james woodyatt <jhw@google.com <mailto:jhw@google.com>>