Re: Objection to draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 02 March 2017 08:57 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12BA81294BB for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 00:57:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nxr8CEtN-NcP for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 00:57:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua0-x236.google.com (mail-ua0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D303F1294AC for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 00:57:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua0-x236.google.com with SMTP id q7so37256480uaf.2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:57:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KnpzPrwYLvfCEMZCgNP0ZXC5dW7BnD1uJML0+ou/uiU=; b=j/rezlFlXq0Bo903XJ3z5pd5riv2uDct9OiiwgUHcCKGHUI0A4YbEJeK6V+D4MzQNE PpzVEB5yqu+uP6zI40XVEVdHnrEM25mBgrMn2FxBdkPbZmLH/cdTyIvJClpIY9Izya6V zujt1I7+lmMMk4JEUBP3xsqLextGTULbTLBxrbO1HiQE6D6tISkHXbMhS9iRG0RrYLvh I6xuLTk90jJNkETV2rs2TvKVWmh+eiPgJrExcG5VTVv98Bon8zKM4xRYYKEluEesLVNz XvUoJDEGy/Cpjl0UOkhJFcdmkVEPUR2BAET2BUsJGuC3OvCzT16VeXYooIxY0b0Y8uyM lIkg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KnpzPrwYLvfCEMZCgNP0ZXC5dW7BnD1uJML0+ou/uiU=; b=hDIRHXFw4EKbJKiXB3xRcjFoRzXOarXXfe9WPUH/nWAoEe3BM/mRF0CDEeSRr0VXmF nmsm3lCkUrXomn2MmLtzjEGwjcbNpWFkuuqm0yAymgfBK1EY/b0m/Fc3JqxnBkCtYXCI 6KCOMqgEcKaC7ZTL2Z4dRDy+yR9/b7iEx4yQizc+8VkPWyMLGfChTzWVb9ntchX4JKX3 kBKndnjh6r148NV4rjhmfHuUzLVkufuDL+eOPj+AIQrG7Tsrhnixqon7pAC22Aa3Ujkm l/w1YpzBTweK5qTzCGumpresQBjKvBeS6GPXMF3Gfy7Q2XHpAKlF29tCx8mFNCmDo2S9 h9vA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lWu591z2p97mm5gUWS3Ko0pmoBLAtYoOLcv7Dze+Ti9ZSZn/SNPTpPn86qqxkzLITEdl6DTwoJ/jvmaGyu
X-Received: by 10.176.1.5 with SMTP id 5mr5421486uak.30.1488445041737; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:57:21 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.171.2 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 00:57:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <c2e72e72-8e4c-b132-4d0b-2fa9e2f1df23@si6networks.com>
References: <20170223134026.GI5069@gir.theapt.org> <9277BC0B-04F3-4FC1-901E-F83A8F0E02D7@google.com> <58AF6429.70809@foobar.org> <902276E9-0521-4D4E-A42B-C45E64763896@google.com> <58AF726A.3040302@foobar.org> <F7C230DE-4759-4B78-ABF2-6799F85B3C62@google.com> <58B014F6.2040400@foobar.org> <6DA95097-8730-4353-A0C9-3EB4719EA891@google.com> <CAKD1Yr0qk_njAGnex_FZsYisCVw=eM8hXTr1v+wqvcfX_09wiQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAN-Dau0ohz3Wp55bs+eoFvSyoUjuKfjzKGSAsJS3wUt3z7TGtA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0wK8EiAbz39EZz-xZLtsSV2JROSzNECKtGo36Zc=RZ0Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAN-Dau2N-fv3o9o4807m_fbMktjC6hq28sMZhfECKg5cbb4g6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3tHm5x29w4L5KtKi7PqDHRxkPr6i9mJMtHLaPc2eM2GQ@mail.gmail.com> <8ce32e32-3f71-81fc-6bf5-763a4d85fed0@fundacionsadosky.org.ar> <0a3446a1-c7d2-a914-25c1-2c4cf11041b7@gmail.com> <b6432ced-1fe5-7d29-4084-37f7446d29f0@fundacionsadosky.org.ar> <c2e72e72-8e4c-b132-4d0b-2fa9e2f1df23@si6networks.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 17:57:00 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr2Me_1Om68ONAqPxG18H21CbGD-QJZvPm1Pb-mL2ajWxw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Objection to draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d058cfb53780549bb9ded
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/nnIwtX3184lCylDIMX7m6oqDH2o>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 08:57:24 -0000

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>; wrote:

> among other things, it unnecessarily wastes 18 bits of entropy
>

If you ever want that argument to be convincing you'll need to explain by
how much the additional 18 bits of entropy benefit real users in realistic
situations.