Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.txt
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 20 December 2011 01:22 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3713021F84A3 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:22:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.358
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.358 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.241, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XfMEOuIlLZj4 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:22:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com (mail-we0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A19AA21F84A2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:22:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by werb14 with SMTP id b14so1942338wer.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:22:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2jBm/PA+/Se2WeCeVQNfMGblpfPSoUhKwk832Pipk/w=; b=DY8M/EQEYI/aeNKYttgiLTeyyJoaF/IbMbNKQy4hiK+oh7lja6gTuZeTi1fJ5NN+ET UtkX7RYGyYZxkjtDJHYovZcNsFezSR5qZ+rbhYlrAJ5b2i7+3Gg9gG+7l7iukn2gSOhv WNlKn478v6qvLBFuNjlA3a1cZecnjJD4A3cKA=
Received: by 10.216.131.141 with SMTP id m13mr5476860wei.30.1324344143580; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:22:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [130.216.38.124] (stf-brian.sfac.auckland.ac.nz. [130.216.38.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id em4sm18104wbb.20.2011.12.19.17.22.20 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:22:22 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4EEFE34A.4010408@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 14:22:18 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.txt
References: <4EB3F3D6.4090302@innovationslab.net> <CAC1-dtnas++ahkBmpdyq7DbyAEg0W6bZY16qGzKmsP10vC39FQ@mail.gmail.com> <4EEA3D20.7020603@innovationslab.net> <CAKFn1SFvs0PzBXtEWWo814Oe5TJmbQEJBm5FeYJY5xzrr=KFSw@mail.gmail.com> <4EEA5793.8080800@gmail.com> <CAKFn1SHA-=cQ_=5rJVLVMvQYXoTL_D1dCR=uWZK-qFrcGp6P-w@mail.gmail.com> <4EEA7AF8.2090508@gmail.com> <CAKFn1SFp_r7EJ6CpM8EF2zkcJz1z34CdEcRt2i5xcsrWkCBQwQ@mail.gmail.com> <0D0150C3-9E05-4839-ACF1-0E7196420D2F@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|bd681ced736eee0700e443f9acc256d8nBFAnB03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|0D0150C3-9E05-4839-ACF1-0E7196420D2F@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <EMEW3|bd681ced736eee0700e443f9acc256d8nBFAnB03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|0D0150C3-9E05-4839-ACF1-0E7196420D2F@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: 6man Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 01:22:28 -0000
Seems to me we all agree on this much: >> First getting this one out since it fix something quite broken, Regards Brian On 2011-12-16 23:49, Tim Chown wrote: > Well, there are two questions here. > > One is whether the WG believes the update as described in draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05 is correct and complete. I have not seen (yet) any significant technical concerns raised. The last of those were discussed and (we believe) resolved in Quebec. Are there any more? > > The other is whether the WG believes we should publish an update, or a complete fresh version of RFC3484. This was discussed previously in the WG and the update path preferred. If a fresh version is now deemed more appropriate, I am fine to work on that with the other authors if required. > > We just need a decision so we can progress this - it's been so close to release for a long time. Many of the changes in the update have been implemented in a number of platforms already. > > Tim > > On 16 Dec 2011, at 09:38, Roger Jørgensen wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Brian E Carpenter >> <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Roger, >>> >>> On 2011-12-16 10:52, Roger Jørgensen wrote: >>>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Brian E Carpenter >>>> <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Well, the end of my conversation is at >>>>> >>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg14948.html >>>>> >>>>> Summary: "an update that makes it easy for the implementer to find the changes is better." >>>>> >>>>> If it wasn't clear, I believe this document is technically done and needs >>>>> to be advanced, but it does need editorial work as indicated above. >>>> Hmm sorry for being unclear, the technical part looked okay as far as >>>> I could tell, but as the quoted words from you, it will probably be >>>> more confusing to have two documents where the last one update/change >>>> the first one. Would be much better to have just one >>>> replacing/updating the old one. >>> That was my first thought, but then I realised it would cause a lot >>> of delay, and I think getting these changes deployed is quite urgent. >> what about doing it in two step? First getting this one out since it fix >> something quite broken, and then update the old RFC? >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Roger Jorgensen | >> rogerj@gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! >> http://www.jorgensen.no | roger@jorgensen.no >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list >> ipv6@ietf.org >> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- >
- 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise… Brian Haberman
- Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Arifumi Matsumoto
- Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Dave Thaler
- RE: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Dave Thaler
- Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Chris Grundemann
- Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Brian Haberman
- Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Roger Jørgensen
- Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Brian Haberman
- Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Roger Jørgensen
- Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Chris Grundemann
- Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Roger Jørgensen
- Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Tim Chown
- Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Chris Grundemann
- -06 candidate Arifumi Matsumoto
- Re: -06 candidate Mark Andrews
- Re: -06 candidate Arifumi Matsumoto
- Re: -06 candidate Brian E Carpenter
- Re: -06 candidate Mark Andrews
- ULA macro in the policy table Re: -06 candidate Arifumi Matsumoto
- Re: ULA macro in the policy table Re: -06 candida… Mark Andrews
- Re: ULA macro in the policy table Re: -06 candida… Arifumi Matsumoto
- Re: ULA macro in the policy table Re: -06 candida… Mark Andrews
- RE: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Dave Thaler
- Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Dave Thaler
- RE: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Dave Thaler
- RE: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Dave Thaler
- RE: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Dave Thaler
- Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Arifumi Matsumoto
- Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Arifumi Matsumoto
- ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.txt] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Tim Chown
- Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Tim Chown
- Re: ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.… Arifumi Matsumoto
- RE: ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.… Dave Thaler
- Re: ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.… Arifumi Matsumoto
- Re: ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.… Mark Andrews
- RE: ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.… Dave Thaler
- Re: ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.… Arifumi Matsumoto
- Re: ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.… Mark Andrews
- RE: ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.… Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.… Dave Thaler
- Re: ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.… Kerry Lynn
- Re: ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.… Arifumi Matsumoto
- RE: ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.… Marc Lampo
- Re: IPv6 zone index was Re: ULA scope [draft-ietf… Arifumi Matsumoto
- Re: ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.… Mark Andrews
- RE: ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.… Marc Lampo
- Re: ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.… Mark Andrews
- Re: ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.… Mark Andrews
- Re: Re: [homenet] ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3… Ray Hunter
- RE: ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.… Marc Lampo
- RE: [homenet] ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-… Anders Brandt
- Re: ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.… Mark Andrews
- Re: [homenet] ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: [homenet] ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-… Anders Brandt
- Re: [homenet] ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-… Tim Chown
- Re: [homenet] ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-… Don Sturek
- IPv6 zone index was Re: ULA scope [draft-ietf-6ma… t.petch
- RE: [homenet] ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-… Anders Brandt
- RE: [homenet] ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-… Anders Brandt
- Re: IPv6 zone index was Re: ULA scope [draft-ietf… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [homenet] ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-… Brian E Carpenter