Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"

Le 15/11/2017 à 04:08, Jen Linkova a écrit :
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org> wrote:
>>>> There is much IPv4 traffic on the "ietf-v6ONLY" ESSID.
>>>
>>> Also on the DNS64 network. But it is all one-way, you
>>> will notice. No replies as far as I can see. Most of them
>>> are sourced from 169.254.*.*, but there are some oddities such as
>>> 31.130.227.98  224.0.0.1       IGMPv2  42      Membership Query, general
>>
>>
>> Does that return us to the question of how to tell hosts that IPv4 doesn’t
>> live here, and to stop trying?
> 
> I do not believe we should be doing this. How do you tell the hosts
> 'Ipv4[] does not live here, stop trying' and why would you
> be doing this when I can just get hosts talk to each other on link
> using IPv6 LLAs?

You could do that with DHCPv4: it has some mechanism to not respod to 
DHCPv4 Request, or to reduce the lifetime, or reply negatively altogether.

You could also invent an ICMPv4 message send by the Router to the 
IPv6-only Host that says: I only do IPv6.

But to avoid the IPv4 LL-addressed traffic I dont know.

Alex

> Or that...I don't know, DECNET, Appletalk or MPLS does not live here?
> 
> 
>>
>>>
>>> I have a couple of Wireshark capture files if anyone cares.
>>>
>>>    Brian
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>> ipv6@ietf.org
>>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>> ipv6@ietf.org
>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 