IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Thu, 19 November 2020 14:57 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=15925babf5=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C673A0ADE; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 06:57:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8FonASXgdiX2; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 06:57:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:495::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87AF33A1123; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 06:57:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1605797823; x=1606402623; i=jordi.palet@consulintel.es; q=dns/txt; h=User-Agent:Date: Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic:References:In-Reply-To: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; bh=gZahF8uR ccXZsKA/EmtFnznSX0FBbpnbO4YnZrvwwdo=; b=bg7E8/+bYaqmlOYu0DbfJrUw zAzB7El2bGyx+xjtx8TLfmgA3U7+mo498KbIU+m3r5sHJMZSTk7Wvwqk0kCUBb8C dwUGsQzyu11i4r1kray0UG1ji6DlVxvl4DCWar9FwGin+u3F5X3TSUOv0rp0w7BL r6nFLWQei35VQFZwunU=
X-MDAV-Result: clean
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:57:03 +0100
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:57:03 +0100
Received: from [10.10.10.144] by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v16.5.2) with ESMTPA id md50000468077.msg; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:57:02 +0100
X-MDRemoteIP: 2001:470:1f09:495:39a3:9029:40e2:ed12
X-MDHelo: [10.10.10.144]
X-MDArrival-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:57:02 +0100
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Return-Path: prvs=15925babf5=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.43.20110804
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:57:01 +0100
Subject: Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, 6MAN <6man@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <1E62A56C-85BF-47C6-A554-1E296042E40A@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
References: <CABNhwV3fj-e9bEemivcNovnD3SZvKm8ZjFKp7BmusnPcgyznFQ@mail.gmail.com> <7ED24CC7-A719-4E9B-A5DC-3BA8EA7E3929@consulintel.es> <CABNhwV19neE3U_AisNp2nDUF4bWB8P8xHNEznDevZLE9amFTRA@mail.gmail.com> <0F78C18B-7AD6-4AC7-AF1F-CA1ADCDEA6AB@employees.org> <CABNhwV3bCss9y7cT6w2i+LKWBh1viPSXBM-CTaK+GVDyPS2D8w@mail.gmail.com> <20201119141633.GC13005@Space.Net>
In-Reply-To: <20201119141633.GC13005@Space.Net>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/ocjiakaMDuCu0A2UTmURP4sLmIA>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 14:57:56 -0000

Exactly!

Blame vendors that did a bad job, not IETF or RIRs. Vendors should follow standards, and if they not, pay for the consequences. Standards should not be "adapted" to vendors.

Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
 
 

El 19/11/20 15:19, "ipv6 en nombre de Gert Doering" <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org en nombre de gert@space.net> escribió:

    Hi,

    On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 08:58:33AM -0500, Gyan Mishra wrote:
    >     3GPP gateway does not support DHCPv6

    Why can this not be changed?

    A few 3GPP gateways vs. "billions of phones"?

    (Especially since 3G standards seems to already include DHCPv6)

    Gert Doering
            -- NetMaster
    -- 
    have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

    SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
    Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
    D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
    Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

    --------------------------------------------------------------------
    IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
    ipv6@ietf.org
    Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
    --------------------------------------------------------------------



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email