IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses

Roger Jørgensen <rogerj@gmail.com> Wed, 28 March 2012 06:43 UTC

Return-Path: <rogerj@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0F6F21F8798 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:43:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.169
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.169 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.130, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e6rKE9qXxK2C for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:43:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9857321F8796 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:43:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iazz13 with SMTP id z13so1154358iaz.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:43:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wwfgHs+rpMhrk6ecyJZ0vZEuNqlJZLXTA9/P0Xd0ZA4=; b=wWJyAS5XKi8jAba4wPSMTNkrpVdVxbx8NFASFAhjhKkjEb8z0f8Rb3h4pPIKdRODBD kvK52/ynxnAg2KE6rEWxzKWca7/iIKvvwzDhKS7gmVfRKbw8Zr3NRYuIwsuBRoM4eDnu zKoSdgW2a26L8Tx1ZTZMB0lpJgueWBxvSzjSzGTJzo0gCWBZTAyO0kiZ3JkrOnRi5pit mI8O9XTClUKdD+2t08um5obWhPlg6pt2o6Ho0q/L0KLICtQLid76BFC9jBWf0WLDvNHr uuefv8Xzb7AZFlOmNSF6LhwDIxIPlKVDTToJ1lIhOudVo/Zp53whTexDtmEKD85CtRHg 7E6A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.194.163 with SMTP id hx3mr1194395igc.49.1332917021210; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:43:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.117.200 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:43:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4F716D5C.40402@innovationslab.net>
References: <4F716D5C.40402@innovationslab.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:43:41 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKFn1SEMMMcw1nWW76nrb93dHJN1+EWDqorWc-hZ=L9dZb5q_g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses
From: Roger Jørgensen <rogerj@gmail.com>
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:43:42 -0000

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Brian Haberman
<brian@innovationslab.net> wrote:
> All,
>     The chairs would like to get a sense of the working group on changing
> the current (defined 3484) model of preferring public addresses over privacy
> addresses during the address selection process.  RFC 3484 prefers public
> addresses with the ability (MAY) of an implementation to reverse the
> preference.  The suggestion has been made to reverse that preference in
> 3484bis (prefer privacy addresses over public ones). Regardless, the
> document will allow implementers/users to reverse the default preference.
>
>     Please state your preference for one of the following default options :
>
> A. Prefer public addresses over privacy addresses
>
> B. Prefer privacy addresses over public addresses

If it also is stated that there _should_ be an options to override it
either by policy (Enterprise/Corp) or by manual (typical end-user),
then I would say options B over A.



-- 

Roger Jorgensen           |
rogerj@gmail.com          | - IPv6 is The Key!
http://www.jorgensen.no   | roger@jorgensen.no

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status