Re: Status of <draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-16.txt> in AUTH48

Brian E Carpenter <> Sun, 12 February 2017 18:56 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3940E1299C2 for <>; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:56:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uld3FYZogK8n for <>; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:56:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB39A129405 for <>; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:56:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id 204so7635375pge.2 for <>; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:56:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Dczjv0Kcb3BWcKtyoUK1fGQyzNWlxIyFucr6vAI+Rr8=; b=gNP6VkUVEauO9EsPzknEZzkD8cFjeq8j8hEifox4L6hLaGXi7swSsQuqeIF43IMnor F/Thvq+NVAFUf1Y0ez16RiRs2T/lbKJAK5Vx1nJqaLd2JNI9Z62OaHzQiOehPSbZPhnc qpQrHIrgQOFO9YFJM7ItGubHQxG92aKyr+HCXDku7Hla2QVLU+QD0yWOrDMA2RKwFhlH rNpkJPtg9srv7+HILefL+xLLNCCIRQG5VY7/oJzS4ZJrqef2GtUC8rDDWh6v305QWvoW q2YZIV/IzNWiMfy3pfYCe0KRNVj1EonLf8UxGr+KLb8d7LvmH9e3q7MuiPWtolhVruVU 461Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Dczjv0Kcb3BWcKtyoUK1fGQyzNWlxIyFucr6vAI+Rr8=; b=GA4JKj1Qm1iAc1xLA2VdB0Z2aGsARKFoLThSwHyvVfguFu5N2GAUe+3QvWRHB2IH1T j2CZ/ViBn82gHnn35AfcBFw4ciJCmnWaDUfOQErwvK0w5zlP2EDiT9hqxCVDQiF2TDJn oqaLGGE1l5dHWtlacY58QepaFMIrQSLkVHej8HJRDZSSRPVelJ00HpgnVZSsXspzZVbx j1HlSd+TJOE9gI3v82lykwBQ9AQCEmTEWk+nkvSyNPpbV0vvDbqax0icn154RPwCyoNk CeyNbYGs4URX+zhxkrNkf9ZCSwVrK1qYB06LprBQxj9Gbabffo/KqWUkhoO5NAhJ+0KQ UihQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39loQvggzM7rb2NH965V5SwLpU5W2zpjhL/Anlrcg94r/wXOjOS49CaYhtdhR1PkLg==
X-Received: by with SMTP id y126mr22878246pgy.8.1486925814150; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:56:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:6e60:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:6e60:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by with ESMTPSA id e4sm16365666pgc.45.2017. for <> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:56:53 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Status of <draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-16.txt> in AUTH48
References: <>
From: Brian E Carpenter <>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 07:56:48 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 18:56:56 -0000


I don't think this is a WG matter and I don't think it's the IETF's business
either. It seems to me that this matter is in the scope of the RFC Editor to
decide, if the authors can't, since it's about the style and contents of an RFC.
IMHO, it has nothing to do with its technical content or with the fact that
it's an IETF stream document.

   Brian Carpenter

On 12/02/2017 06:28, Bob Hinden wrote:
> Hi,
> <draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-16.txt> is currently in AUTH48.  According to the datatracker it has been in the RFC Editor queue for 54 days.  Everything is done, except there is an impasse over a change to the Acknowledgement Section.  One of the authors has proposed adding:
>    Fernando Gont would like to thank Nelida Garcia and Guillermo Daniel
>    Gont for their love and support, and Jorge Oscar Gont and Diego
>    Armando Maradona for their inspiration.
> Some of the other authors don’t think this change is appropriate for AUTH48, but the author proposing this has insisted on adding this text.
> Please respond with either support or non-support for this proposed change by 18 February 2017.  I think it is unfortunate to add extra delay over this change, but after consulting with our AD, I think the best course is to ask the working group.
> Thanks,
> Bob (Document Shepard)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> Administrative Requests:
> --------------------------------------------------------------------