Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses

Hi,
if an co-author has a right to vote :)

I like B.

If privacy address is attached, then it should mean it should be preferred.

On 2012/03/27, at 16:33, Brian Haberman wrote:

> All,
>     The chairs would like to get a sense of the working group on changing the current (defined 3484) model of preferring public addresses over privacy addresses during the address selection process.  RFC 3484 prefers public addresses with the ability (MAY) of an implementation to reverse the preference.  The suggestion has been made to reverse that preference in 3484bis (prefer privacy addresses over public ones). Regardless, the document will allow implementers/users to reverse the default preference.
> 
>     Please state your preference for one of the following default options :
> 
> A. Prefer public addresses over privacy addresses
> 
> B. Prefer privacy addresses over public addresses
> 
> Regards,
> Brian, Bob, & Ole
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------