ready for WGLC? (was RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-3627-historic-00.txt)

"George, Wes" <wesley.george@twcable.com> Tue, 29 November 2011 14:03 UTC

Return-Path: <wesley.george@twcable.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76EA21F85DB for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 06:03:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.187
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.650, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, MANGLED_TOOL=2.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X4PeV9ZdD6-e for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 06:03:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cdpipgw01.twcable.com (cdpipgw01.twcable.com [165.237.59.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4997821F852E for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 06:03:03 -0800 (PST)
X-SENDER-IP: 10.136.163.15
X-SENDER-REPUTATION: None
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,590,1315195200"; d="scan'208";a="303130831"
Received: from unknown (HELO PRVPEXHUB06.corp.twcable.com) ([10.136.163.15]) by cdpipgw01.twcable.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 29 Nov 2011 08:58:04 -0500
Received: from PRVPEXVS03.corp.twcable.com ([10.136.163.26]) by PRVPEXHUB06.corp.twcable.com ([10.136.163.15]) with mapi; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 09:03:00 -0500
From: "George, Wes" <wesley.george@twcable.com>
To: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 09:02:58 -0500
Subject: ready for WGLC? (was RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-3627-historic-00.txt)
Thread-Topic: ready for WGLC? (was RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-3627-historic-00.txt)
Thread-Index: AcyuAAm/NRYxjwynQsGh13WpGcFgTQAnye6Q
Message-ID: <DCC302FAA9FE5F4BBA4DCAD4656937791452CA9574@PRVPEXVS03.corp.twcable.com>
References: <20111128190030.17335.6978.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20111128190030.17335.6978.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:03:04 -0000

This is simply a name-change to reflect WG adoption. All feedback that I've received was addressed in the revision of draft-george-6man from 00 to 01, so I believe that this document is ready for WGLC. Chairs, if you agree, could you please put forward the formal LC?

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-3627-historic-00

Thanks,

Wes George

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 2:01 PM
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
> Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-3627-historic-00.txt
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories. This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Maintenance Working
> Group of the IETF.
>
>       Title           : RFC3627 to Historic status
>       Author(s)       : Wesley George
>       Filename        : draft-ietf-6man-3627-historic-00.txt
>       Pages           : 4
>       Date            : 2011-11-28
>
>    This document moves RFC3627 (Use of /127 Prefix Length Between
>    Routers Considered Harmful) to HISTORIC status to reflect the
> updated
>    guidance contained in RFC6164 (Using 127-Bit IPv6 Prefixes on Inter-
>    Router Links).  While a standards track document already supersedes
>    an informational document and therefore RFC6164 is the appropriate
>    guidance to follow when the two documents are in conflict, this
> links
>    the two documents so that it is clearer that the IETF has updated
>    guidance on the matter.
>
>
> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6man-3627-historic-
> 00.txt
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6man-3627-historic-00.txt
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.