IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPv6] PvD (RFC 8801) is not relevant to MHMP

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 01 December 2022 19:58 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1877CC14CE45 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 11:58:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.397
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oZqtBVjyrnj4 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 11:58:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00022C14F725 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 11:58:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC051800E; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 15:24:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id UJt908BfdQfX; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 15:24:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:56b2:3ff:fe0b:d84]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF271800D; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 15:24:14 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1669926254; bh=ENhmWSHfUzkaF8IdhWHIeaXahvkrXAmVR5wgPHpOBbk=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=iYBU9jAkoYxqFig52Fm+jfbl55iHL12EVcIThW9Y2rz95P6XXK/rP3PxTTurIZSNk f/nZJzHqwwVsBcziHFN8famoCN+MkmiVfTfvwQRINOeANUuknUS0CmwCt2qsFCZ4px jCvB4nn65XZJ7zxdsiZ5NI6aVaL7jrNXQhnTTcyrSGmv5rg+CK5BU9eqk598wUU6w9 PA4NECQ+zSXC/IXqwvlFoM+BeLvO8A1Oo6bVlK7UrtWof947PE96+/oxqdx+xVjXjR ZcTBzSroQKWRJJbb7tUPQfIDkyXL64EOWQPX4XoW9xtX9/Q5Z54v7udYK02oxmIxY6 Yu2jxCJLxl/DQ==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A7A4440; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 14:58:04 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
cc: Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1kxa48cPRD8JpW+X3Sd0PdHrxsR35dVqVuHmkiYapXwJQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8e49314ba8304b54be88fc365987a97c@huawei.com> <CAPt1N1kxa48cPRD8JpW+X3Sd0PdHrxsR35dVqVuHmkiYapXwJQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 27.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 14:58:04 -0500
Message-ID: <27976.1669924684@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/qUnu7nR8mznugABOanENeNT2glM>
Subject: Re: [IPv6] PvD (RFC 8801) is not relevant to MHMP
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 19:58:10 -0000

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
    > If the application is using synchronous getaddrinfo, all is lost. Why
    > would we care to try to fix this case?

Well, it's not all lost since for many applications this is fine, or there
are these "threads", which have become safer and safer lately (particularly
if you use Rust), but... a better API could also be asynchronous.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email