IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Stateful SLAAC (draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host)

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 13 November 2017 02:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9DE1286B2 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 18:17:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sjeVrIDKmwym for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 18:17:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x232.google.com (mail-pf0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E34B91252BA for <6man@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 18:17:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x232.google.com with SMTP id n89so10792317pfk.11 for <6man@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 18:17:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=5JwFZpAgt6PTbqI1BH5en4hgZsYa1JIQtmpHJF+vee0=; b=FnIEkhv7TPY/fV9gtmGLvOLNeDGIsYQnw271jSQTGjeC5MjhnEuFgQ3NrikuIMdOBs c3mN9aejNGp/nbP2LMbFmxU7yfma5wH1n79YJD4hFrsumSsedI+F1YzPRWxJtL5Pk5vN 7NkpVLhSBn9U7jxtq6KjABCjbAKFg37x+My1bzwIoH0ZUCgz2hWUJ7HbrIy9GwiiOm6s XPi6RQ5zhrZsVHAxsYkhuUAf72rUoxEYjomOyJzHDyl/cihhmmDz2YfP5fwx8oaBxogC 0v/VxTJvmmSljCaFDmSr59W6YjDIwQScNRcwMTJs535BLBrK+I23omNhDn4Yb4ciBtTu 406g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=5JwFZpAgt6PTbqI1BH5en4hgZsYa1JIQtmpHJF+vee0=; b=NLD6k3MwdFYX3eYDwbVyiyWIxCfi6nWn1jLLrW6miTspmL6iHtgdoSBISCT46SnQCt OziJnlTPUgosYHIuNq9zy3pT9dGeIMfRjeAhneVSchpu80fpq0XXGRiy2JaIxX/uAHsT qfB3mFHCWzeBaJnkANraPuOuUlQg9xEyduEFlRMToUbNpLbzP0owYoAvM27Jk5pj7WOc XeG7659qILI6HI/PQ/xCfItZFvMKYaH/UguDEbVuzkTNAqV7H2uvP+aVBnpyZ5Fg8ptV grNmxOoJXj+DH9Mdl01E1q3SqxuGjzjRE5Tu2TVzuZEXZpKaP2iaEYj1Jp/pDoVbg2OQ kFLg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX49W0cMgLWfuMSsZQhsygUpptQwfGX9DgJ9Xuz8tEteq+jKI6CJ xjeg+9BMS89/rBzTB9viDEHJiQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbCuubuu1QIIR8zX+qV3ELfRgkevMe10A6z1M4BkkTc2lf64/f4SRLC3SnXxqhr+sW+3a7Nsg==
X-Received: by 10.99.100.67 with SMTP id y64mr7191934pgb.19.1510539438471; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 18:17:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:1998:344f:2622:bc20:2ef? ([2001:67c:370:1998:344f:2622:bc20:2ef]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o123sm21039098pfb.102.2017.11.12.18.17.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 12 Nov 2017 18:17:17 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <B8AFD65E-4744-4A16-BDB1-DD8920A401A0@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_68C707D4-E0EB-4554-BF9F-263B078A189F"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Stateful SLAAC (draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host)
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 10:17:15 +0800
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr26NK2osApYZBm8Yd=0X7xcetrxojp6=JHOEAu9BB0q8A@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
References: <be9724f5-2ff5-d90c-2749-ecae2c628b78@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr0_a2Qm8U4oK+BQU57DeDUD9i-o_+G+YhnH4pVXRxmxxQ@mail.gmail.com> <9d154133-a1de-7774-1589-c7069bf279ee@si6networks.com> <0b45890d-ea4a-47b8-a650-ceb72b066df8@gmail.com> <ea772bfd-4004-7f94-8469-b50e3aff0f29@si6networks.com> <F2330138-6842-4C38-B5A0-FB40BFACD038@employees.org> <e40697ca-8017-c9d2-c25d-89087046c9cf@gmail.com> <207f040a-7fe2-9434-e7a5-f546b26fdf63@strayalpha.com> <CAKD1Yr26NK2osApYZBm8Yd=0X7xcetrxojp6=JHOEAu9BB0q8A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/qjmU_BbZr11Mh15gSYNy-EbLaA0>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 02:17:23 -0000

On Nov 13, 2017, at 10:14 AM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> wrote:
> Excuse me, but I really cannot fathom why we are saying that this draft defines a new protocol when it is an explicit goal for all existing implementations to continue to work. How can this be a new protocol when all implementations implement this already?

All host implementations have to work.   In order for them to work, new router behavior has to be specified.   That sounds like a protocol spec to me.  My question would be, why is this a problem?   I think that the document could be clearer about required behavior, but it already basically says what needs to happen.   Discussing this with Suresh on Saturday morning convinced me that more clarity would be useful, but that seems like a pretty easy problem to solve.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email