Re: Updated IID length text

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 19 January 2017 19:28 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6673A12943B for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:28:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 55jxSqHbwv_P for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:28:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x232.google.com (mail-pg0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30897129407 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:28:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x232.google.com with SMTP id t6so16461632pgt.3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:28:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/tOWsMfvPWxAKlqAwS4Y7ObRhUwL9FmdK/4SqTvN2h0=; b=NA0Cyvw4xQtiFt/+7sRpBC8TmhF+iSxyUWggrWwdYw6gDuw/V3TRLrw+rJC+UUZZXq ryYfS9BMdeItD2PX6fnIa0Mt38ccI2QLHY3jIHnreSSfNBhCj0pKMrwCzyrAGxFB9Y+e X1PaQHVCw5OhckdQ0iaD2kf7EVP+anNgFbRTu0AqckCghGcA86ZTgtqa6WqilEMnW2xA lvix3DrTLkYXnSryKfLCYuzLwDPJ31xMKlkPlE00dPkZy/qUkElxUPAsNOf0rDuZ68K2 wlctStQjkVd18OmuOSLZ+csvFo6zFrIfYHB943kTMYcZUAIPnT3ULfxgoL+lq70eIh7G IQjg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/tOWsMfvPWxAKlqAwS4Y7ObRhUwL9FmdK/4SqTvN2h0=; b=jE4Cy/sSbwOoN0tiuH8x/QIPclWs+l85nUTMgB/Vgl5LaY1O5fLAXSLB92+Cc1Xb4g OMhR60HRd9Fxb53IyRoef4TrCP2PAbAkteVfOZNDiczcpu1iHaOSTSjdKcl72/Wqi/7B ZqietVqkLWlDFssMRwQtmAB5gvbTfX/S7Z+OHtuK6h7BAx+SnVGhjoT82aykBKHdhhg+ T/F4oQtXjWlx0lZTz9rLZBr3wg48ogntb4qOcUiMWS1ORtmLml+WaysLh7UwpDWOMFeZ c7L8B4ZGyqT2SUvqxB+C1286JeOQbgzs4UugsahELShFNcPCAKOa5amH6jJeuI3E65AV nvxg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIW9uzujB5vn0MgXwwOEeTQNIS1+o7tMArDOa2QVAP5fxYqLj47PDPfy+vA45o5hw==
X-Received: by 10.99.160.84 with SMTP id u20mr12242275pgn.141.1484854113566; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:28:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.21] ([118.148.118.52]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r8sm10661293pfi.82.2017.01.19.11.28.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:28:33 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Updated IID length text
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
References: <148406593094.22166.2894840062954191477.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <m2fukqbbwv.wl-randy@psg.com> <F6953234-3F85-4E28-9861-433ADD01A490@gmail.com> <m2wpdzhncn.wl-randy@psg.com> <82245ef2-cd34-9bd6-c04e-f262e285f983@gmail.com> <m2d1frhjfn.wl-randy@psg.com> <18e6e13c-e605-48ff-4906-2d5531624d64@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1cvZ8Y3+bHeML=Xwqr+YgDspZGnZi=jqQj4qe2kMc4zw@mail.gmail.com> <m2lguffnco.wl-randy@psg.com> <CAKD1Yr1TrTiPRdyutobmb_77XJ7guNzLrg=H_p7qi4BfQ8V=GA@mail.gmail.com> <m2d1frfm6m.wl-randy@psg.com> <CAKD1Yr2Njjd8_Mr+6TRFF6C5pdcX4yFgpFVyEkykDuytu2B8mg@mail.gmail.com> <2A5073777007277764473D78@PSB> <4596c3d4-a337-f08e-7909-f14270b7085f@gmail.com> <CAN-Dau06R3iYRpYLADhvHox4C9qdsJCuxFsJapRhOQcWT4qk_g@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2weZcoHiBzN94QAQ9WGhWR16PmMMFNg=5YLmr_dhPjjpA@mail.gmail.com> <fcc7f136-b5da-527e-b495-5a2d7f7a3ce8@gmail.com> <ef34bab3-7a58-6ba1-b890-633f808f90f6@si6networks.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <b979a7ac-ed3b-5e2a-8f90-6d2ef067483d@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 08:28:32 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ef34bab3-7a58-6ba1-b890-633f808f90f6@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/qjndhk9ybJtwqFsYPCqThl73t2E>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 19:28:35 -0000

Hi Fernando,
On 19/01/2017 17:03, Fernando Gont wrote:
> Hi, Brian,
> 
> On 01/18/2017 09:37 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> OK, after all that discussion, here is a revised proposal. There is
>> nothing new here at all, IMHO; just clarification:
>>
>> OLD
>>    For all unicast addresses, except those that start with the binary
>>    value 000, Interface IDs are required to be 64 bits long.  Background
>>    on the 64 bit boundary in IPv6 addresses can be found in [RFC7421].
>>
>> NEW
>>    IPv6 routing is based on prefixes of any valid length up to 128 [BCP198].
>>    For example, [RFC6164] standardises 127 bit prefixes on point-to-point
>>    links. However, consistent use of Stateless Address Autoconfiguration
>>    (SLAAC)[RFC4862] requires that all interfaces on a link use the same length
>>    of Interface ID. To guarantee interoperability of SLAAC, a fixed length of
>>    Interface ID is necessary. 
> 
> s/fixed/consistent/.

That would use the word 'consistent' twice, which is slightly horrible English.
But I agree with the intention.

    Brian

> 
> Thanks for your energy in this,
>