Re: RFC6085 update to rfc2464bis
Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Wed, 11 January 2017 18:58 UTC
Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E78A129D62 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 10:58:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.353
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.353 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q9dCrTMu4wuF for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 10:57:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cirse-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16696129D53 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 10:57:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse.extra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.4) with ESMTP id v0BIvtWE009234 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 19:57:55 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id E4D2620CE68 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 19:57:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEEE120CD68 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 19:57:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id v0BIvtNu016495 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 19:57:55 +0100
Subject: Re: RFC6085 update to rfc2464bis
To: ipv6@ietf.org
References: <C2C9A241-BBE1-4DC1-BA9D-B6D20EF75FD6@gmail.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <13c5524c-bcc4-dfe1-867b-2580316f09a7@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 19:57:55 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <C2C9A241-BBE1-4DC1-BA9D-B6D20EF75FD6@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/rdabM0GC6h1wW80cJjgmIAKoBqg>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 18:58:01 -0000
Has one witnessed a packet dump of IPv6-over-wired-Ethernet (not WiFi) featuring a dst _IP multicast_ address with the dst _MAC unicast_ address? Alex Le 09/01/2017 à 22:53, Bob Hinden a écrit : > Hi, > > Based on update from RFC6085 I added two paragraphs to Section 7 of <draft-hinden-6man-rfc2464bis-01>. These are: > >> 7. Address Mapping -- Multicast >> >> An IPv6 packet with a multicast destination address DST, consisting >> of the sixteen octets DST[1] through DST[16], is transmitted to the >> Ethernet multicast address whose first two octets are the value 3333 >> hexadecimal and whose last four octets are the last four octets of >> DST. >> >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> |0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1|0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1| >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | DST[13] | DST[14] | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | DST[15] | DST[16] | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > An IPv6 multicast packet may also be mapped to a unicast Ethernet > Link layer address as defined in Section 6. > > An IPv6 node receiving an IPv6 packet with a multicast destination > address and an Ethernet link-layer unicast address must not drop the > packet as a result using of this form of address mapping. > > While RFC6085 isn’t exactly clear about the change it wants in RFC2464, I think this is about right. > > Comments? > > Thanks, > Bob > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- >
- RFC6085 update to rfc2464bis Bob Hinden
- Re: RFC6085 update to rfc2464bis Sander Steffann
- Re: RFC6085 update to rfc2464bis 神明達哉
- Re: RFC6085 update to rfc2464bis Bob Hinden
- Re: RFC6085 update to rfc2464bis 神明達哉
- Re: RFC6085 update to rfc2464bis Bob Hinden
- Re: RFC6085 update to rfc2464bis otroan
- Re: RFC6085 update to rfc2464bis Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: RFC6085 update to rfc2464bis - Ethernet or Wi… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: RFC6085 update to rfc2464bis - Ethernet or Wi… Carsten Bormann
- Re: RFC6085 update to rfc2464bis Mark Smith
- Re: RFC6085 update to rfc2464bis - Ethernet or Wi… Fred Baker
- Re: RFC6085 update to rfc2464bis - Ethernet or Wi… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: RFC6085 update to rfc2464bis Bob Hinden