IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-16: (with COMMENT)

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Fri, 24 January 2014 16:53 UTC

Return-Path: <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F041A0016; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 08:53:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.756
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.756 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GN9yLNnN8sJI; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 08:53:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898411A0057; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 08:53:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s0OGqh8h000522; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 16:52:43 GMT
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk s0OGqh8h000522
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=ecs.soton.ac.uk; s=201304; t=1390582363; bh=rnqaIK520lT0N7aZK5EWTO532oE=; h=Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=s3HgL/Z2l0KMLppjWhd4JwNXnVw5fQvBQGVMfxsEquum9QawXV6S/hJLWY7HPkrWE j3tESBEP/Lb/9JYKELct/A1xi1/b1bz1BW8+7NN8pz7ghJXq55SShSLAs7pTppPVYd 9UkfQuTJ7WGM+6Mm+E/KQuGoqRcrbOboBilR2wxI=
Received: from gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102::25d]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) envelope-from <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> with ESMTP (valid=N/A) id q0NGqh0959621873Vn ret-id none; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 16:52:43 +0000
Received: from dhcp-161-173.wireless.soton.ac.uk (dhcp-161-173.wireless.soton.ac.uk [152.78.161.173] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s0OGqeWD016001 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 24 Jan 2014 16:52:41 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
Subject: Re: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-16: (with COMMENT)
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <52E1009F.2040104@innovationslab.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 16:52:43 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <EMEW3|a0d573aa23c56693308b75d307cb225aq0NGqh03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|325221D1-3669-4F2E-A264-FA5F8FBA9BC5@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <20140123092102.22697.55292.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <52E1009F.2040104@innovationslab.net> <325221D1-3669-4F2E-A264-FA5F8FBA9BC5@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-smtpf-Report: sid=q0NGqh095962187300; tid=q0NGqh0959621873Vn; client=relay,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=6:0; fails=0
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-ID: s0OGqh8h000522
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Cc: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, 6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org, ipv6@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses@tools.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 16:53:09 -0000

Hi,

On 23 Jan 2014, at 11:44, Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> wrote:

> Tim & Benoit,
> 
> On 1/23/14 4:21 AM, Benoit Claise wrote:
>> Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-16: No Objection
>> 
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>> 
>> 
>> Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>> 
>> 
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Please Tim's OPS DIR review (currently under discussion)
>> 
>> First, I would note that I have already contributed comments/text to this
>> draft, as acknowledged by Fernando.  It’s been a few versions since I
>> last read it.
>> 
>> The goal of the draft has considerable merit, and I believe the document
>> is worthy of publication, subject to comments belwo being considered.
>> 
>> I would classify the document as ‘Ready with issues’.
>> 
>> Issues:
>> 
>> 1. In the discussion in section 5 on the algorithm, it may be desirable
>> to suggest that implementations allow a choice of IID generation based on
>> ‘classic’ SLAAC with EUI-64 or via this new proposed method, with a
>> default of the new method.
>> 
> 
> Actually, this preference is out of scope for this document.  There is a
> BCP in the works within 6MAN that will describe the current thinking on
> which IID-generation mechanisms should be preferred.

OK, that makes sense. I agree that such a document on IID-generation would be very useful if the topic is not mentioned in this draft.

It may be an excuse to dust off draft-chown-6man-tokenised-ipv6-identifiers as one option...

Tim

> 
> Regards,
> Brian
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email