[IPv6]Re: Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-09: (with DISCUSS)

[Zaheduzzaman Sarker <[e-mail]>]

Hi Bob, Hi Ron,

We discussed this today during the telechat, and I was made aware of rate
limiting property of ICMPv6 by my learned colleagues.

We are fine here. No need to add anything in this spec.

I will clear my discuss.

//Zahed

On Thu, 30 May 2024 at 18:11, Bob Hinden <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> On May 30, 2024, at 4:42 AM, Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <
> [e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-09: Discuss
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-comp-rtg-hdr/
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks for working on this specification.  Special Thanks to Gorry
> Fairhurst
> for the TSVART review.
>
> I have one question that I would like to discuss further to understand
> better -
>
> - In the processing rules, we are seding ICMPv6 Messages so how often are
> we
> sending them? if this is not rate limited, what are the risks we are not
> considering here?
>
>
> Rate limiting of ICMP error message is part of the ICMPv6 specification
> RFC 4443.
>
> See Section  2.4. Message Processing Rules, subsection (f) of
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4443.
>
> Routers implement rate limiting ICMPv6 error messages.    Is there
> something specific about this draft that this needs to be called out?
>
> Bob
>
>
>
>
>
>
>