RE: Questions regarding the security mechanisms//RE: CRH and RH0

"Xiejingrong (Jingrong)" <xiejingrong@huawei.com> Sat, 16 May 2020 07:23 UTC

Return-Path: <xiejingrong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E1FB3A08B2 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 May 2020 00:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7PSZqQGxmxpm for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 May 2020 00:23:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DAA13A08B1 for <6man@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 May 2020 00:23:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml722-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 65BFD2B4B7949CDF10A4 for <6man@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 May 2020 08:23:35 +0100 (IST)
Received: from nkgeml706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.98.57.153) by lhreml722-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Sat, 16 May 2020 08:23:34 +0100
Received: from nkgeml705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.98.57.154) by nkgeml706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.98.57.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Sat, 16 May 2020 15:23:32 +0800
Received: from nkgeml705-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.98.57.154]) by nkgeml705-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.98.57.154]) with mapi id 15.01.1913.007; Sat, 16 May 2020 15:23:32 +0800
From: "Xiejingrong (Jingrong)" <xiejingrong@huawei.com>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Questions regarding the security mechanisms//RE: CRH and RH0
Thread-Topic: Questions regarding the security mechanisms//RE: CRH and RH0
Thread-Index: AQHWK1DdHpQ20I7Q8kuwYxgyjhLhLqiqT6LQ
Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 07:23:32 +0000
Message-ID: <e6d9eebb58604aa0b26df50b72fa43db@huawei.com>
References: <23488ea0d4eb474c9d7155086f940dae@huawei.com> <006c01d62aa1$8c195520$a44bff60$@com> <DM6PR05MB634863122645FD4981B97F71AEBD0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <e4cfefa0-eeb4-22ee-6d9b-1abac21ce962@si6networks.com> <DM6PR05MB63486BC1056350B4E6B744FEAEBD0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <91723b56299e435a8debefab60ffb834@huawei.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200516000435.106f80f0@elandnews.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20200516000435.106f80f0@elandnews.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.45.163.108]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/tBKOKW736uYzmso2HdQFJFd6-Vk>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 07:23:38 -0000

Good to learn.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_through_obscurity

Thank you!
Jingrong

-----Original Message-----
From: S Moonesamy [mailto:sm+ietf@elandsys.com] 
Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2020 3:08 PM
To: Xiejingrong (Jingrong) <xiejingrong@huawei.com>; 6man@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Questions regarding the security mechanisms//RE: CRH and RH0

Hi Jingrong,
At 11:44 PM 15-05-2020, Xiejingrong (Jingrong) wrote:
>In my common sense, the security should not be dependent on any kind of 
>assumption like "you can't guess out the mapping", or "you don't know 
>the SID".
>Is there any theory or IETF BCP to state such principle ?

It is known as security by obscurity.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy