IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-resilient-rs-02.txt

Erik Nordmark <nordmark@sonic.net> Wed, 22 January 2014 22:15 UTC

Return-Path: <nordmark@sonic.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF1C61A04DD for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:15:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.435
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.435 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WO8zVDxqiuSc for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:15:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from d.mail.sonic.net (d.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E3F1A04A2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:14:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.44] (184-23-158-201.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [184.23.158.201]) (authenticated bits=0) by d.mail.sonic.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0MMEVl4008274 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:14:31 -0800
Message-ID: <52E042C7.2090906@sonic.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:14:31 -0800
From: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@sonic.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>, Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-resilient-rs-02.txt
References: <20131021233827.32495.34424.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKD1Yr2eBffHBA-xSepNaJQ-az56F01pgry5sdRbTRC0VMhf_w@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr2CWsysF8XD8MxiKF9rZnhxWrUO9L6-RrwETGQGEqOuzw@mail.gmail.com> <6299FD64-01A9-4F19-B271-9891AFCA3269@gmail.com> <52E03E13.8080800@acm.org> <25AE033D-3671-479E-A739-6C5F7DF221E1@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <25AE033D-3671-479E-A739-6C5F7DF221E1@employees.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Sonic-ID: C;zhQ0kbKD4xGbqtRAJ1f4WQ== M;mN1kkbKD4xGbqtRAJ1f4WQ==
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 08:34:38 -0800
Cc: draft-ietf-6man-resilient-rs@tools.ietf.org, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 22:15:08 -0000

Ole,

Are you speaking as a co-chair or as a WG contributor?
I don't know whether this is your gauge of WG consensus or personal opinion.

Thanks,
    Erik

> I don't think this document should make any reference to links that does not send unsolicited RAs.
> that doesn't mean it cannot say how router discovery can work more robustly.
>
> cheers,
> Ole
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email