IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: problem statement [was Re: New Version Notification for draft-hinden-ipv4flag-00.txt]

Alejandro Acosta <alejandroacostaalamo@gmail.com> Mon, 20 November 2017 14:54 UTC

Return-Path: <alejandroacostaalamo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B0EA129A90 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 06:54:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y46LvZOfLUHJ for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 06:54:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua0-x234.google.com (mail-ua0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9874F126C0F for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 06:54:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua0-x234.google.com with SMTP id 21so6043309uas.13 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 06:54:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=BbuV4uDc5EOSSn1HRIXWfZx/aXIh/l66yx65DHP2tzA=; b=HDRY6vmtxgCamPQZHj2Dl1Aamiit3zBSNyZYIOVWTkbNer9lnYd5i6lRLjbVZAfldu RuhewqtWM+NUgDXCJzsTQZ0Q/7hA+8S9n+oWXSRBqoKIbntRI4CEn7ot2sFROQbtUjXN V4q+F1rDHKutmD6plPs3+9bQJO8BdyxNtqoCQyh1K9wBHnR04R+tfRSjBqvme2+bEs8r rjlpIVrq5Q3qAg1a3iux2wSVZxYvBPIaXwRwYreeJXHCTu8S9UjWtkh55v4BXo5Ax+WH r5QorrWlJQwb1wgayrsb99Sw61Aad1jpqLsDh/MN7KqBbG0roPD7WykNgQZn48VCIFqC zEEg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=BbuV4uDc5EOSSn1HRIXWfZx/aXIh/l66yx65DHP2tzA=; b=r3mlLitedP4h40mXzsZljYBcTmuwnm2LvVFOZBOu4d+N2pQXR0kY2tOg69lWGY0hD6 XVEnQ5hyH7nZgXG2dSCSWAGMZ16TsPjHN5fWxC50e6Z3mCjNvhRb2uhkcNAEHqpa/Hgf m5HZMJkbHzTFPnpiGsWcEGzaRCPYZjyBIjawLJ4AbAoxCMYlGES0jNy3UnqVg7S+8KXO vCdJhjuI8U1C9YHpFWOEpNrefLSLBrGW9I1jCDMDA5lFhdY8GTJHFJJNdYeX0t6Mw8rB xScJbDSgu9eZUOxOMgMRHgl+vl3QIApQqAcvi9bAMuWQ4KsrVXizb/j+5MhQ8zEjBy/d 8RdQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX68HKtqZ24whIpRwZqUWbC7BGpLMebqAAzJkhS70Vnylg/xXzHr +vE4ptW8M7tOaFg+dAgbWhF9nILC
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbuTTr1d9ABte0XX2BBEmiJxFEHCh4LGGnd8s0lXkP13DVEnfqoOJT76zuLk9niE+TNFyskAA==
X-Received: by 10.159.34.238 with SMTP id 101mr12283809uan.141.1511189645223; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 06:54:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MacBook-Pro-de-admin-alejandro.local ([190.142.55.3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5sm2772883vkh.10.2017.11.20.06.54.04 for <ipv6@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Nov 2017 06:54:04 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: problem statement [was Re: New Version Notification for draft-hinden-ipv4flag-00.txt]
To: ipv6@ietf.org
References: <151090059151.22321.3357672601322845792.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <E838C63E-7612-4AA4-9375-854C184D699E@gmail.com> <CAFU7BAQKoWPcEFQZgU3k_d0gUL4en6d2pyNq1V4RMNZ6HrSG8w@mail.gmail.com> <649be36e-5006-7688-448f-bc2794d6a39c@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3WC+vwL_=0PeiJ_D85NqFVTCkb8c83x-ZtGhAbSELGMA@mail.gmail.com> <5A119443.2030108@foobar.org> <CAFU7BASwgLfkO-4kk9-vba_P+jmcFHD5+Hy_7b3cnNkOSv30wg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3pKk22Hkxy4_8YMZYiA4Wwp=6JzdRDKFGdTY1gf=ntfA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711200848390.32099@uplift.swm.pp.se> <05ec66fb-e48f-b891-3c98-12fb5381bf35@gmail.com>
From: Alejandro Acosta <alejandroacostaalamo@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4d9c0872-2402-f4da-5b9f-6d33cb010f4b@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:54:02 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <05ec66fb-e48f-b891-3c98-12fb5381bf35@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: es-ES
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/tPOLrfmmM2PkKNvQ3_GxM0nxYHI>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 14:54:08 -0000

Hello,


El 20/11/17 a las 10:33 a.m., Alexandre Petrescu escribió:
>
>
> Le 20/11/2017 à 08:51, Mikael Abrahamsson a écrit :
>> On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
>>
>>> Sure. But you wouldn't need complicated infrastructure for this - if
>>> all that's necessary is to respond to a DHCPv4 request with a canned
>>> "no DHCPv4 here" packet that is always the same, that's a lot easier
>>> to deploy than a full DHCPv4 infrastructure.
>>
>> This functionality doesn't exist today in any access network I know of. 
>
> That may not exist, but the counterpart functionality of blocking all
> that is _not_ IPv4 may exist.
>
> On my enterprise IPv4-only network my laptop's RJ45 leds did not even
> blink this morning.  It was because I had unchecked IPv4 on my
> Windows, because I used in the Terminal Room at IETF, which was IPv6
> only.
>
> I suppose the switches on my enterprise network block all RJ45 that
> dont reply to IPv4, and block them hardly (RJ45 leds are off).

What a interesting situation..., may I ask which switches are you using?
(if you don't want to mention it publicly I accept unicast)



>
> Same laptop connected to a dumb hub had the leds on.
>
> Alex
>
> [snip]
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email