Re: draft-gont-6man-managing-privacy-extensions-00.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 15 March 2011 22:15 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9B83A6BD3 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.457
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.457 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.142, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r0JtjApSjU3D for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B50763A6BC6 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:15:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm15 with SMTP id 15so1150945fxm.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=UpjBIqvd9uDwtUnIb7Cshso1U8xcSjsqziOZ9VLrQsI=; b=u5/uffwKb2lGzLruKSNWfixBlaH4FVQsW6Twk0JSn3ot1dFk2VqKDhVZELsuBjqC0D s29Lf9VLZ55YDq+D/32f7fubnnRHNt7LLwp8W1LuOuArii5dWWarxCRDGi3MNONJW8Bt Tu/kxk4dGan4DdDVOrOZms68+ZO14ALy53yXA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=XvVOaN8DZzdZvBo9VDxGg/Jr9VKm3/D7lSSLQoM29fZHYsWLxZoMkU9xnd1LdsUYUH o1j4q0H1r+zEXgupbTqj5Jo71rz9Cbc22Nydf3xG2+cslXI7b0lyvwL9yyf6vvRYSM8y 7QXiZU0OZykG0bKsV70OF+TkqdkXhunPlJ41s=
Received: by 10.223.15.141 with SMTP id k13mr77041faa.30.1300227426462; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.216.38.124] (stf-brian.sfac.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.38.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 17sm162578far.19.2011.03.15.15.17.02 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4D7FE55B.7050207@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:16:59 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
Subject: Re: draft-gont-6man-managing-privacy-extensions-00.txt
References: <7111FC5F-BC3F-4242-9C3F-037E79894749@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1103091212570.7942@uplift.swm.pp.se> <4D77CBB9.1080702@gmail.com> <20110310071925.309d467b@opy.nosense.org> <4D7F539E.7030308@gont.com.ar>
In-Reply-To: <4D7F539E.7030308@gont.com.ar>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org, Ran Atkinson <ran.atkinson@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 22:15:42 -0000

Fernando,

On 2011-03-16 00:55, Fernando Gont wrote:
> On 09/03/2011 05:49 p.m., Mark Smith wrote:
>> I agree. I sort of accept that an ISP can know my addresses in use, in
>> part because they gave them to me. However, for an ISP to not let me
>> choose if I want to use privacy addresses on the Internet would
>> be completely unacceptable.
> 
> Why would you find it acceptable to have the ISP assign you the complete
> address e.g. with DHCP, then?

In the context of a user requiring privacy protection, it isn't acceptable.
As far as I know, what the ISP will assign is a prefix; the individual
host addresses are locally assigned by the CPE.

Thus, in an Internet cafe, a user using privacy addresses can be traced
to the cafe but no further, even if the cafe is also using DHCP to
assign addresses.

This is also why we accept the negligible risk of address collisions
referred to in another thread.

   Brian