IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lowpan] [Roll] draft-kelsey-intarea-mesh-link-establishment-03.txt

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 22 June 2012 02:04 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C4A21F8594; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:04:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.603
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.603 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.351, BAYES_00=-2.599, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZQbnhuWxkoy5; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:04:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [67.23.6.41]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24EEF21F8503; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:04:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (wlan203.sandelman.ca [209.87.252.203]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6020F84D9; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 22:01:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id C4E9A98C2F; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 22:04:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from marajade.sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B2A98C2D; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 22:04:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Thomas Heide Clausen <ietf@thomasclausen.org>
Subject: Re: [6lowpan] [Roll] draft-kelsey-intarea-mesh-link-establishment-03.txt
In-Reply-To: <6EBA154B-EFDC-4E46-B04F-D86546B4F07E@thomasclausen.org>
References: <CC00B369.170E9%d.sturek@att.net> <6EBA154B-EFDC-4E46-B04F-D86546B4F07E@thomasclausen.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.3; nmh 1.3-dev; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 22:04:40 -0400
Message-ID: <32622.1340330680@marajade.sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Cc: "<richard.kelsey@ember.com>" <richard.kelsey@ember.com>, "<ipv6@ietf.org>" <ipv6@ietf.org>, "<roll@ietf.org>" <roll@ietf.org>, "<6lowpan@ietf.org>" <6lowpan@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 02:04:43 -0000

>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Heide Clausen <ietf@thomasclausen.org> writes:
    Thomas> If an AD sponsored submission is the intend, then I do
    Thomas> honestly not know what the proper way of shaping the process
    Thomas> / forum for discussions / framing of the specification would
    Thomas> be, but I would hope that an AD could chirp in (as you say
    Thomas> INT, have you discussed this with Brian or Ralph, and could
    Thomas> you or either of them let us know?)

AD sponsored submission is more than enough process.
(it could go via independent submission easily too)

Unless I missed something, the only proceedural thing MLE needs is a UDP
port number, which is available via Expert Review.  
Zigbee could publish MLE itself if it wanted to, but I understand that
it may have application beyond the links defined/used by Zigbee.

-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works 
IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email