Unprocessed errata for RFC4941

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Mon, 04 November 2019 08:42 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8FD1200B9; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 00:42:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DRFOWUUcisJv; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 00:42:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57C9D12009E; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 00:42:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.36] (unknown [177.27.208.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DAF97825A2; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 09:42:53 +0100 (CET)
To: "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
Cc: "6man-chairs@ietf.org" <6man-chairs@ietf.org>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Subject: Unprocessed errata for RFC4941
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Message-ID: <50c84bc8-49c6-81d1-63c6-d455cd8ecbc5@si6networks.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 05:40:55 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/v39FcMDkrv0iavrlClMNPwqZzpg>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 08:42:58 -0000

Folks,

While working on RFC4941bis, I went through the errata. Some errata are
still in the "reported" state. This is what I suggest for them:

* Errata 4763 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4763):

Change status to "Verified"


* Errata 5182 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5182):

Change status to "rejected", on the basis "The issue raised goes beyond
a fix via the errata system. This should be raised in the appropriate
working group within the IETF." (same as
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4594).


This would leave us with a clean slate.

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492