Re: [v6ops] A proposal for draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07 - timeline

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Thu, 09 March 2017 12:52 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9352112957B for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 04:52:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.332
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.332 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T04I7Q6psZDM for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 04:52:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F13B129571 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 04:52:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin.extra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.4) with ESMTP id v29Cpxmt018337; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 13:51:59 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 50FE2206DD9; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 13:51:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 443E7203801; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 13:51:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id v29CpxIg022314; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 13:51:59 +0100
Subject: Re: [v6ops] A proposal for draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07 - timeline
To: otroan@employees.org
References: <CAN-Dau17q_BrUuzfvB1mLDt6p5UxYikphWaHpa8VQ2L-3kx-DA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOSSMjUR203+hYFBrFBrj9Xkjux3o7fYNd4y9kNyxwpLxF11ew@mail.gmail.com> <6D825351-7F43-4540-89AB-48DC2B5E92E3@google.com> <CAOSSMjUP6m-L1iNhE=BxHW+7hvt4YsZgxxtVn+qmgEVS9HeStA@mail.gmail.com> <3EC22050-D159-488D-A354-E46F04764E25@google.com> <CAOSSMjW_fPz3RdPyK=e-EyvyW4GawFAr3zcGLkBzDcR8Ws2MUw@mail.gmail.com> <90292C5E-013D-4B7C-B496-8A88C7285CD7@google.com> <CAOSSMjXf1ah6nrAorf+mpnOxXBpHg6difgCo4mQ6rPVZoU8CSw@mail.gmail.com> <7FAD8D2B-B50E-44C5-AAA3-0C91621D9D54@google.com> <CAOSSMjX4Rq969cTuAU+sqWmW7Rh2-nxjd1vpSkeAevVZTed1HA@mail.gmail.com> <ED8E5513-A522-4D37-A0A2-0960CF3E5394@google.com> <36251EE1-309C-44B5-BEAE-591889492547@employees.org> <9B6D49C1-D793-465B-A395-28147BD22FAC@google.com> <CAOSSMjUy2=yguYh6iMmd6O6d91WrdNEFgo9Gn+4urVp33vug2Q@mail.gmail.com> <3397bed0-1ca8-7b62-8215-7561883de4a9@gmail.com> <420E5EB5-2FD8-4CF6-B067-5C51501911CE@employees.org>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <3d534946-7432-ba92-0acc-68a43e3e5469@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 13:51:58 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <420E5EB5-2FD8-4CF6-B067-5C51501911CE@employees.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/vFUBDpF9WvqujTDnKYlpD1v4Tb0>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 12:52:05 -0000

Le 09/03/2017 à 09:18, otroan@employees.org a écrit :
> Alex,
>
>
> [...]
>
>> Retrospectively:
>>
>> At time of that discussion, year 2004, there was no IPv6 on
>> cellular links, [I-D]. Since then 3GPP got many recommendations
>> from IETF about how to run IPv6. The result is 3GPP User Equipment
>> links only support a single 64 today.
>>
>> My supposition, and many indications converge, is that the 64
>> recommendation from the IPv6 Addressing Architecture RFC led to
>> this undesirable situation of a single 64 for an UE.
>
> That is one speculation. You may reconstruct history differently: If
> it wasn't for RFC6177/RFC3177 combined with the 64-bit boundary (and
> SLAAC), what you would have had on a UE would be a single IPv6
> address.

:-) I can agree :-(

But I cant continue that way...

Alex