IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Fri, 30 March 2012 00:25 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC25B21F8547 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.516
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.083, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U9xwwkhapyOl for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D83321E8054 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:d::19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.isc.org", Issuer "RapidSSL CA" (not verified)) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66C0AC941E; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:24:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:820:b9d2:d2a7:a07b:5597]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 111AF216C31; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:24:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by drugs.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30DA1F3C24B; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:24:34 +1100 (EST)
To: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <4F716D5C.40402@innovationslab.net> <4F71F217.7000209@globis.net> <03d301cd0d97$b3361060$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <CAFnCNEdWUFDjoCBKeZYiCwEjvAepqK2ZXrsy+yoKmQze5vwKmQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F74F78F.1020002@dougbarton.us>
Subject: Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:00:15 PDT." <4F74F78F.1020002@dougbarton.us>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:24:34 +1100
Message-Id: <20120330002434.F30DA1F3C24B@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:25:04 -0000

In message <4F74F78F.1020002@dougbarton.us>, Doug Barton writes:
>
> Also, if you're on a home network, it doesn't matter what the bottom 64
> bits are, your network prefix is enough information for the bad guys to
> use as ICBM targeting coordinates.

And if we want to address home networks then we need a way to signal
that we want both stable and temporary prefixes with PD and a way
to differentiate them when advertising them via RA.  DHCPv6 already
has IA_NA and IA_TA.

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email