RFC6085 update to rfc2464bis

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Mon, 09 January 2017 21:54 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29217129878 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 13:54:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jx02k4fxqnob for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 13:54:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22b.google.com (mail-wm0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5880712986E for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 13:54:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id k184so137779794wme.1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 13:54:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:subject:date:message-id:cc:to:mime-version; bh=/lw/OnkD6uWlqZeJtardB4463nXnCORSQ5x+ZzStVOE=; b=AZxKwCnoYqq6sN4nqowHft9ZMAykMHnhls84R4ZfMeUn28tRTK4tVcgGAMAxS2KPjh aedsUTrG1E6TVzRIr+Ej99MsQd/PK6f4gnm+fL0M59cJi7iKVzUP6e9J/MxHg95qnZxf 1a3bGr72QprotbGYCq8ZnGyh1GO+zAfLrEqjRtFqZmULAoM5xZD9+IxnXiClA4nCpXzz gmrNzmGWVFrHbza8MQoeWluXhuZm86xseDxNiKSS+38+0EJDCv7BcHo18y/P87qmVXkW +iuLGiKjYkR8JLYqRww/g82CJkZ6kUpsrRXvtyj1gfmWTlvOFusy40Ff1/UJG7l42qn2 JJ4A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:date:message-id:cc:to:mime-version; bh=/lw/OnkD6uWlqZeJtardB4463nXnCORSQ5x+ZzStVOE=; b=sXepGECj7AnhoENyCYFCwt/tlaNdemBk7jW4pTqVcSTxgN+No7mOj143EBoJ6sQYYV eYsBhK9u450Zw6Jf7Kkvz0Kj4JlrqBb4IeFdwNYk67fe/dfUx3Pfeduf0X+LVKxfwrk8 Rhk9++YoM1n/wOpaIjYhrzKkrUO5BuyErkSyVOBdQK5AB7i+PX5CDAv8/bUJCwZ7BqZ4 bcBor3euDAxM9r+/i6mIxqDrRWbybYA7EGyzcPzBBG5sh58XEC6q7OqoDGuP7+CkuHM2 Qidt0Te8RvRG4gWrlr95Y6YZ+pFuQmEKu6KQhCbEn4ED6ZZAsOmiEKJt9iXbNxz5iiM5 47QA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJK0BGab2Ncfjp0E6KuIKuXY77jvyICmhGO2Q/op3gfg+SRuWZKwvmo77srmJgDaw==
X-Received: by 10.28.19.205 with SMTP id 196mr5408776wmt.111.1483998840730; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 13:54:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.161.14] ([209.97.127.10]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m78sm251940wmd.8.2017.01.09.13.53.59 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Jan 2017 13:53:59 -0800 (PST)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7133BE40-F380-4562-A600-D5E4828AA75A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Subject: RFC6085 update to rfc2464bis
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 13:53:54 -0800
Message-Id: <C2C9A241-BBE1-4DC1-BA9D-B6D20EF75FD6@gmail.com>
To: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/vnzf3TeK0VuDyJJDfwFn8dmZg20>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 21:54:04 -0000

Hi,

Based on update from RFC6085 I added two paragraphs to Section 7 of <draft-hinden-6man-rfc2464bis-01>.  These are:

> 7.  Address Mapping -- Multicast
> 
>    An IPv6 packet with a multicast destination address DST, consisting
>    of the sixteen octets DST[1] through DST[16], is transmitted to the
>    Ethernet multicast address whose first two octets are the value 3333
>    hexadecimal and whose last four octets are the last four octets of
>    DST.
> 
>                   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>                   |0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1|0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1|
>                   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>                   |   DST[13]     |   DST[14]     |
>                   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>                   |   DST[15]     |   DST[16]     |
>                   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   An IPv6 multicast packet may also be mapped to a unicast Ethernet
   Link layer address as defined in Section 6.

   An IPv6 node receiving an IPv6 packet with a multicast destination
   address and an Ethernet link-layer unicast address must not drop the
   packet as a result using of this form of address mapping.

While RFC6085 isn’t exactly clear about the change it wants in RFC2464, I think this is about right.

Comments?

Thanks,
Bob