Re: Vehicle's VIN in IPv6.

Jong-Hyouk Lee <jonghyouk@gmail.com> Thu, 31 March 2011 14:32 UTC

Return-Path: <jonghyouk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D118D28C139 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 07:32:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b0zKp3CWbDnl for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 07:32:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com (mail-ww0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAFB428C137 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 07:32:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wwa36 with SMTP id 36so2026237wwa.13 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 07:34:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=orBKeBDb4BSLakoohk54jDE7SY7oQkoNfwEkF1aHwgQ=; b=vtKy3VIjyYsaDQ46QGoXa9vuqRpMOgNET30KYHulbhqMfzn9zMlfS5MNHP+gL50apU TBAldyEIKLtnZ7LH64M28BXHqewIzkUpxg4H4z+xmxVCQjYJHed93OHCzMv0/XMB7/Z9 Pyu/wt9LdMGYoHgdeuzZ/CIYRhSOJotd1lPEc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=k5rvSbvKn4mK3AN+GkP9v2UmxeOCxXqlvXH9/qWbHV67mVjzPOL0YELyy12dHth3Gr /wFEjd7Eo6a9dhv3P0QKKhqC8h0CZ3QCNpf9x4fqwnZ8PY0QdxPpAyAixA4KWqjZQe1S uy5JX2VJdrH40qrFNSJYSgnffejVU+dBImQds=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.172.7 with SMTP id j7mr2782184wbz.60.1301582060777; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 07:34:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.152.201 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 07:34:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6CEB6E26-AE20-450B-AD61-BE7B7029EFCF@gmail.com>
References: <5C4A2B87ED124653A9BDEDAC14D6F2C8@sparrow> <4D944365.4020809@kit.edu> <4D944505.3060407@gmail.com> <E9DE74CB-03B0-4529-B6D1-BD875332C20F@gmail.com> <AANLkTimmqkddMrTAzn0yZYKJ1mnSGAoOTqiiir92beE2@mail.gmail.com> <6CEB6E26-AE20-450B-AD61-BE7B7029EFCF@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:34:20 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTikyThYbMwAiB=47beqTCwR70=zsskBVAc37kokW@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Vehicle's VIN in IPv6.
From: Jong-Hyouk Lee <jonghyouk@gmail.com>
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Radek_Wr=F3bel?= <radoslaw.wrobel@pwr.wroc.pl>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:32:42 -0000

Dear all.

Plz, see inline.

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>; wrote:
>
> On Mar 31, 2011, at 1:15 PM, Scott Brim wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:32, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>; wrote:
>>> They could use a fixed car address and use mobile IPv6 with a provider based address.

Clearly, not Mobile IPv6, the correct one is NEMO able to form the
in-vehicle network wherein hosts, e.g., electronic control units, can
attach through IPv6 addresses.

>>
>> That would help.  A rendezvous point (e.g. home agent) always helps to
>> protect confidentiality. Plus a firewall to protect the
>> always-out-of-date vehicle software.   They can work out how to do
>> path optimization later.
>
> I agree.  If you put the "home agent" in the middle of the internet (for some value of middle), then path optimization probably isn't that important.

No. The routing performance in terms of NEMO, i.e., IPv6 data packets
destined to hosts attached to a vehicle, should not be solved by
locating the home agent in a proper location at the Internet. It
should be approached by thinking of how network prefix being used in
the in-vehicle network, i.e., mobile network prefix in terms of NEMO,
is provisioned.

Cheers.

>
> Bob
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>



-- 
IMARA Team, INRIA, France.
Jong-Hyouk Lee.

#email: jonghyouk (at) gmail (dot) com || jong-hyouk.lee (at) inria (dot) fr
#webpage: https://sites.google.com/site/hurryon/