Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 14 February 2017 19:59 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403E31297D4; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:59:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tZwl6iKMcnAy; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:59:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x243.google.com (mail-oi0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCE7C129420; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:59:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-x243.google.com with SMTP id x84so3645304oix.2; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:59:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6Frf95Jc1E4K0s5Vg6+OVBUibpAZHAWj1jw7fo3Bc84=; b=Uu5QDQ1WD6Uu4nDLFUlKxDqqlGRBux/BL51tTSPO/s4IOmOE01xKAuRzDCtW/RlN6E BE90oAn3LNKpAX6+vKLLw1WmcpuNoYn3AaGnjR/PhEQExh9acbhU/mkR9CpJjgcV163n EhAKYy8sYIl8ev3oxu7m3MEutsvxnmmKWmgFr8OEF4qfgNGUuuw/+lVuJQu+1Qc6SjVw UdFsHQrqoZdL6tqY2biCzIA43jBATvcjGIPWEk4JySiGrsmsC96ufADhtzemRD7pF8+M ODgKnNc2V+/oVFjQSR9kNhJ9KzD5jpwUJ2Cu6pfoGSLQJQgfyEzPmq1iamDQYzX3lxqD ZdtQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=6Frf95Jc1E4K0s5Vg6+OVBUibpAZHAWj1jw7fo3Bc84=; b=YlB6L+9Ewcr0sMCGm4rKFCgNPjohVg5v5pQtPQu+yJGdd3eMtlJUF57ihE9Y9UeH36 QyINQSb8Sv9XCUgAqLUIjoFRuGV3UYNRyutLfNTvkDG3TObb57FUsyjcYStAD9R5ja7i VZ5BlCyCr3NctmI1iooXtSZmqlCOtGJkAMvqz6l8X01pg6Vl5NX6Im9+dxBWfJbS5I7i fMzqxCzJymKqO78MRJWnF0+giDscjDLxECu85b1KZT0T99m++u7pXOTM/F2E+L2qcqvt Ax8J2HqvgodIDxNekwH5OenWw0hqYXKA3SkCQ3pZ2IC9IUqlRc36cLz72f8twt7cHTMW MDkw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39np/5sK3dNWLmBIo4A2X6oTyaOglyU0ff59M0tKaqhyzNy/AypSdb0MNiuGFcUMMA==
X-Received: by 10.84.229.76 with SMTP id d12mr37386526pln.21.1487102383040; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:59:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.21] ([118.148.78.74]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w16sm2878517pgc.15.2017.02.14.11.59.39 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:59:42 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
To: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>, Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
References: <148599306190.18700.14784486605754128729.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAN-Dau0kDiSNXsyq9-xEdS5mzLt-K+MYHqoV8aC8jDVREw8OPQ@mail.gmail.com> <8e5c950a-0957-4323-670f-f3d07f40b4df@gmail.com> <CAN-Dau30OuJ7_57302shrSOs8+sc6iaoDgV27umxb59uwb_pZQ@mail.gmail.com> <E780DEC3-F0E9-4A35-B3EA-8D6961775276@consulintel.es> <CAN-Dau24tGpEvFEjk7xdu9tyN30bYwB6GmVMQjtKHs8LYFAJMQ@mail.gmail.com> <2A163C6E-FFBE-4502-BC2F-0DE8DF88C081@consulintel.es> <CAN-Dau2Qv1dww_yxgw_SCx+zmVjXrctkPRoTK9i1x2--zHrxRg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <cd45eabb-6dd4-1ffc-ff92-aaa395f1fabf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 08:59:41 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAN-Dau2Qv1dww_yxgw_SCx+zmVjXrctkPRoTK9i1x2--zHrxRg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/vzQ_31DiZpAxB52XzSVt_E8Y8ew>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis@ietf.org, IETF-Discussion Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, 6man-chairs@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 19:59:51 -0000
I certainly agree with that approach too. In answer to Alexandre: you are correct that this value is a parameter for RFC4862. But for reasons we have discussed often, it needs to be fixed by the architecture. Regards Brian On 15/02/2017 08:18, David Farmer wrote: > So I hear you saying something like the following would be appropriate in > your opinion; > > However, the Interface ID of all unicast addresses is required to be 64 bit > with the exception of the following; addresses for point-to-point links > [RFC6164], Network-Specific Prefixes used for IPv4/IPv6 Translators > [RFC6052], and addresses that start with the binary value 000. > > While this is the less preferred approach as far as I'm concerned, I > believe it resolves the issue I raised. > > Thanks. > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:07 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ < > jordi.palet@consulintel.es> wrote: > >> I understand that, but those are two clear exceptions, no others should be >> “allowed” by default. >> >> Keeping the door open is not good in my opinion. Specific exceptions must >> be taken in consideration one by one. >> >> Regards, >> Jordi >> >> >> -----Mensaje original----- >> De: ietf <ietf-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu >>> >> Responder a: <farmer@umn.edu> >> Fecha: martes, 14 de febrero de 2017, 17:03 >> Para: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> >> CC: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis@ietf.org>, >> IETF-Discussion Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, <6man-chairs@ietf.org> >> Asunto: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 >> Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard >> >> The problem we want it to be 64 bits except when it's not suppose to >> be, such as RFC6164 for point-to-point and RFC6052 for IPv4/IPv6 >> translators with /96 Network-Specific Prefix. >> >> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 9:53 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ < >> jordi.palet@consulintel.es> wrote: >> >> Agree, we shouldn’t change that. Must be 64 bits. >> >> Regards, >> Jordi >> >> >> -----Mensaje original----- >> De: ietf <ietf-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de David Farmer < >> farmer@umn.edu> >> Responder a: <farmer@umn.edu> >> Fecha: martes, 14 de febrero de 2017, 16:27 >> Para: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> >> CC: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis@ietf.org>, <6man-chairs@ietf.org>, >> 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, IETF-Discussion Discussion <ietf@ietf.org> >> Asunto: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP >> Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard >> >> Actually, in addition to your text there still needs to be a >> recommendation for 64 bit IIDs in all other cases. 64 bit IIDs are(and >> should remain) the norm for IPv6, I do not want to change that. But the >> current language say IIDs are always 64 bit except when an address begins >> with binary 000, leaving no room for any other exception. And this is >> plainly incorrect, I provided two clear exceptions that are already >> standardized. Furthermore, IIDs other than 64 bits are in operational use, >> with manual configuration and DHCPv6. >> So I'd suggest; >> >> However, the Interface ID of unicast addresses used for >> Stateless Address Autoconfiguration [RFC4862] is required >> to be 64 bits long, in all other cases it is recommended to >> be 64 bits long. >> >> The other option is to enumerate all the exceptions, requiring the >> document to be updated every time a new exception is standardized. >> >> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Brian E Carpenter < >> brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> At an earlier stage I suggested restricting the applicability >> of the "However..." sentence to SLAAC [RFC4862]. A short way >> of doing this would be >> >> However, the Interface ID of unicast addresses used for >> Stateless Address Autoconfiguration [RFC4862] is required >> to be 64 bits long. >> >> Regards >> Brian >> >> On 14/02/2017 11:32, David Farmer wrote: >> > I have concerns with the following text; >> > >> > IPv6 unicast routing is based on prefixes of any valid length >> up to >> > 128 [BCP198]. For example, [RFC6164] standardises 127 bit >> prefixes >> > on inter-router point-to-point links. However, the Interface >> ID of >> > all unicast addresses, except those that start with the >> binary value >> > 000, is required to be 64 bits long. The rationale for the >> 64 bit >> > boundary in IPv6 addresses can be found in [RFC7421] >> > >> > The third sentence seems to limit exceptions to 64 bit IIDs to >> exclusively >> > addresses that start with binary vale of 000. There are at >> least two other >> > exceptions from standards track RFCs, that should be more clear >> accounted >> > for in this text. First is [RFC6164] point-to-point links, as >> mentioned in >> > the previous sentence. I think the clear intent of [RFC6164] is >> to allow >> > one(1) Bit IIDs for point to point-to-point links using any >> Global Unicast >> > Address, not just those that start with 000. Second is, >> [RFC6052], which >> > updates [RFC4921] and seems to allow 32 bit IIDs or /96 prefixes >> for any >> > Global Unicast Address when used for IPv4/IPv6 translation, >> referred to as >> > ""Network-Specific Prefix" unique to the organization deploying >> the address >> > translators," in section 2.2 of [RFC6052]. >> > >> > Thanks. >> > >> > On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 5:51 PM, The IESG < >> iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> The IESG has received a request from the IPv6 Maintenance WG >> (6man) to >> >> consider the following document: >> >> - 'IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture' >> >> <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> as Internet Standard >> >> >> >> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and >> solicits >> >> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments >> to the >> >> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2017-03-01. Exceptionally, >> comments may be >> >> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain >> the >> >> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. >> >> >> >> Abstract >> >> >> >> >> >> This specification defines the addressing architecture of >> the IP >> >> Version 6 (IPv6) protocol. The document includes the IPv6 >> addressing >> >> model, text representations of IPv6 addresses, definition of >> IPv6 >> >> unicast addresses, anycast addresses, and multicast >> addresses, and an >> >> IPv6 node's required addresses. >> >> >> >> This document obsoletes RFC 4291, "IP Version 6 Addressing >> >> Architecture". >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The file can be obtained via >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis/ >> >> >> >> IESG discussion can be tracked via >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis/ >> ballot/ >> >> >> >> >> >> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> -------- >> >> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list >> >> ipv6@ietf.org >> >> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/l >> istinfo/ipv6 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> -------- >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------ >> -------- >> > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list >> > ipv6@ietf.org >> > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/l >> istinfo/ipv6 >> > ------------------------------------------------------------ >> -------- >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> =============================================== >> David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu <mailto: >> Email%3Afarmer@umn.edu> <mailto:Email%3Afarmer@umn.edu <mailto: >> Email%253Afarmer@umn.edu>> >> Networking & Telecommunication Services >> Office of Information Technology >> University of Minnesota >> 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 <tel: >> 612-626-0815> >> Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 <tel:612-812-9952> >> =============================================== >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ********************************************** >> IPv4 is over >> Are you ready for the new Internet ? >> http://www.consulintel.es >> The IPv6 Company >> >> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged >> or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the >> individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware >> that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this >> information, including attached files, is prohibited. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> =============================================== >> David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu <mailto: >> Email%3Afarmer@umn.edu> >> Networking & Telecommunication Services >> Office of Information Technology >> University of Minnesota >> 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 >> Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 >> =============================================== >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ********************************************** >> IPv4 is over >> Are you ready for the new Internet ? >> http://www.consulintel.es >> The IPv6 Company >> >> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or >> confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the >> individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware >> that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this >> information, including attached files, is prohibited. >> >> >> >> > >
- Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (I… The IESG
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Fernando Gont
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… David Farmer
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… David Farmer
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Fred Baker
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… David Farmer
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… David Farmer
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Karsten Thomann
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… otroan
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… David Farmer
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… David Farmer
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Randy Bush
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… otroan
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… sthaug
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… otroan
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Randy Bush
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Randy Bush
- AW: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Karsten Thomann
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… sthaug
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… otroan
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… otroan
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Randy Bush
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… otroan
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Randy Bush
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Mark Smith
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… David Farmer
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Alexandre Petrescu
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… james woodyatt
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Randy Bush
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Mark Smith
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Fred Baker
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… otroan
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… james woodyatt
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… otroan
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… David Farmer
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… james woodyatt
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Sander Steffann
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Sander Steffann
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Sander Steffann
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Sander Steffann
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… David Farmer
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Job Snijders
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Fred Baker
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Job Snijders
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Job Snijders
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Job Snijders
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Karsten Thomann
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Mark Smith
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Mark Smith
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Job Snijders
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Christopher Morrow
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Christopher Morrow
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Job Snijders
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… David Farmer
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Job Snijders
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Christopher Morrow
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Christopher Morrow
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Randy Bush
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Mark Andrews
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Job Snijders
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Job Snijders
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… David Farmer
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Job Snijders
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Mark Smith
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… David Farmer
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… David Farmer
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Randy Bush
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Randy Bush
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Randy Bush
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Fernando Gont
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Randy Bush
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Randy Bush
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Erik Kline
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Fernando Gont
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Erik Kline
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… sthaug
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Fernando Gont
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Fernando Gont
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… sthaug
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Fernando Gont
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Philip Homburg
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Pierre Pfister
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Job Snijders
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Wilco Baan Hofman
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Job Snijders
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Christopher Morrow
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… 神明達哉
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… David Farmer
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Christopher Morrow
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Mark Andrews
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Jared Mauch
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Jared Mauch
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Fernando Gont
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… David Farmer
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Pierre Pfister
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… David Farmer
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Peter Hessler
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Nick Hilliard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Fernando Gont
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… 神明達哉
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… 神明達哉
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Xing Li
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Xing Li
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Xing Li
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt… Alexandre Petrescu