Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments
Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk> Wed, 16 January 2019 08:15 UTC
Return-Path: <tim.chown@jisc.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786291310EC for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:15:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=jisc.ac.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1yG2J5EB9sHo for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:15:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eu-smtp-delivery-189.mimecast.com (eu-smtp-delivery-189.mimecast.com [207.82.80.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C762130DCD for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:15:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jisc.ac.uk; s=mimecast20170213; t=1547626553; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hOb87us50s3euiiLEYXg2V8NWqEnNrqvhTbSIX3WJgg=; b=bQafzrwAbjBLCAGb6OHwzIdRNYNvld+AzfdmjFf/P44JsG3ByfSHO67ABiM9GRAbEplU3oqkGwB/KQUn9uV4FstXxyAs6sHA3EphX8Na+NOgAMdiJ2GaYNax7C0yNYslhlP0HqzfUZ3MfiqVyzEAqWGv4Zn+plL70fJWhuAkshI=
Received: from EUR02-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-he1eur02lp2054.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.5.54]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id uk-mta-78-YEdkv4gpOcihtzHpzHrqzg-1; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 08:15:49 +0000
Received: from AM0PR07MB4177.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (52.133.59.156) by AM0PR07MB4515.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (52.135.151.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1558.8; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 08:15:43 +0000
Received: from AM0PR07MB4177.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2136:60d1:2238:55ed]) by AM0PR07MB4177.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2136:60d1:2238:55ed%2]) with mapi id 15.20.1537.018; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 08:15:43 +0000
From: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
CC: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments
Thread-Topic: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments
Thread-Index: AQHUqPn0RyQ6S/6cAUydjOgo8+OsUKWoxzGAgAAdVICAAAKvgIAAAucAgAACcACAAAjMgIAASb0AgAAjOwCAAK+7AIAAA6OAgAALsgCAAEZKgIAAE/IAgAAXVQCAAAPVgIAAEn0AgAAEHgCAAE3PgIAABeQAgAAOCICAAFcDgIAAfXIAgAAZ3oCAAApHAIAABP2AgAGEMYCAAAiDgIAABpaAgAAEKwCAAATlgIAAAcOAgACUkQCAABHPAIAA77OAgAAaEgCAAjdVgIAAAxsA
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 08:15:43 +0000
Message-ID: <3823E79A-B382-4186-9CDD-97A987174466@jisc.ac.uk>
References: <CAOSSMjV0Vazum5OKztWhAhJrjLjXc5w5YGxdzHgbzi7YVSk7rg@mail.gmail.com> <1b2e318e-1a9f-bb5d-75a5-04444c42ef20@si6networks.com> <CALx6S37TJr++fC=pVoeS=mrO1fHc4gL_Wtu-XkVTswzs2XxXCA@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S36V7vrVyoTP0G6+S5XeFNB3KWS5UaNnVi20xogRERdCfg@mail.gmail.com> <973A1649-55F6-4D97-A97F-CEF555A4D397@employees.org> <CALx6S34YbBe8xBod3VsWVO33TpZcdxh2uV1vaO8Z_NKnVXp66g@mail.gmail.com> <A3C3F9C0-0A07-41AF-9671-B9E486CB8246@employees.org> <AEA47E27-C0CB-4ABE-8ADE-51E9D599EF8F@gmail.com> <6aae7888-46a4-342d-1d76-10f8b50cebc4@gmail.com> <EC9CC5FE-5215-4105-8A34-B3F123D574B9@employees.org> <4c56f504-7cd7-6323-b14a-d34050d13f4e@foobar.org> <9E6D4A6E-8ABA-4BAB-BEC5-969078323C96@employees.org> <CAAedzxpdF+yhBXfnwUcaQb-HkgdaqXRU3L+S7v8sS1F0OkwM9A@mail.gmail.com> <78a8a0e0-8808-364c-41f7-f81f90362432@gont.com.ar> <CAAedzxpjxhP0nOZVU0CTwA1u3fsPFthrJASjDEfnLcRNvr2gBQ@mail.gmail.com> <c9be798e-5a32-7c3e-a948-9ca2fab30411@si6networks.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1901160902240.5601@uplift.swm.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1901160902240.5601@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
x-originating-ip: [2001:a88:d510:1101:2869:dd5d:52e0:80b0]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; AM0PR07MB4515; 20:qHN1Cb8kLOAVMU1nb55aif9FPl1/wGZl4av3HNdEfx4gUnhtLwohjL8zon1gC5jsa1RefPD439Aye+zd0vGl9TwhTJ9bHXLreh1+iEkfd8s1o30fcDDyZZbx7oJPnw+ybn8ObgO9L+X01OpAO9ObrrjiJsqOJXcpXC1f/eyOWC0=
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 90ce61b9-ffe9-4d86-5759-08d67b8acf76
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600109)(711020)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:AM0PR07MB4515;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM0PR07MB4515:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM0PR07MB4515937E7F8461B489AD6B38D6820@AM0PR07MB4515.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 091949432C
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(39850400004)(376002)(396003)(346002)(366004)(136003)(189003)(199004)(6486002)(46003)(6346003)(186003)(6436002)(71190400001)(105586002)(74482002)(229853002)(71200400001)(86362001)(476003)(76176011)(2616005)(54906003)(6246003)(50226002)(53936002)(6306002)(81156014)(6916009)(97736004)(81166006)(83716004)(6512007)(2906002)(4744005)(14454004)(8676002)(36756003)(6116002)(57306001)(478600001)(786003)(82746002)(7736002)(25786009)(5660300001)(256004)(72206003)(8936002)(99286004)(33656002)(4326008)(6506007)(68736007)(446003)(53546011)(102836004)(106356001)(11346002)(966005)(316002)(93886005)(305945005)(486006); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:AM0PR07MB4515; H:AM0PR07MB4177.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: mkUP9gZ7aQQ/+hF3IJn30EB4H9oLkRlhStAp0z3PDt4CcCyuYfPRFwu9QBDvRP3j7Juu4q8JdyU0V978HKk83a0iLCRyxq2JndgN7GS1haVYwQiLhYQMOjZNNDyq6gP3RzfZnlsdYO8oZ99apMzZPTip+KTMZOHvLovXirM+gpa/Y/qF/Tb4oWX2vvgKWMqv8x0tQT4eshGMTghDU4td9CRVLJVEMe5zEiuDc5XBDHvqE7k5JNwJ1k/vtRNkR7gyCrjGHFM8Xc0RefJPShMCXiVZ4NuXOGXATmH1qcahxTeuKZN6bJhUg/F/Rc91nmKAmOD2Z/OqjvpYoqF1/+nKZ0ygUGq2Hgr5EPrPIiwDlL4Am7H3VWU/61Ct5nNqtNPPFYFbp5lSFGn1am1kU+3WKAbgrnzOtWSypMivbN0ZrgE=
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-ID: <9C76D4AEFB6022498660AA2F8FB87875@eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: jisc.ac.uk
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 90ce61b9-ffe9-4d86-5759-08d67b8acf76
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Jan 2019 08:15:43.4575 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 48f9394d-8a14-4d27-82a6-f35f12361205
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM0PR07MB4515
X-MC-Unique: YEdkv4gpOcihtzHpzHrqzg-1
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="WINDOWS-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/wa-VAZNOuaG5Gu3BvNZdJJdB3Dw>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 08:15:59 -0000
> On 16 Jan 2019, at 08:04, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Jan 2019, Fernando Gont wrote: > >> In that case, we should be removing EHs in the fragmentable part (not >> that it would be a a big deal.. just pointing it out). > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6980 that you wrote talks about this. Having more generic wording that all headers must be in the first packet would make a lot of sense for the generic use-case. Do we have that requirement anywhere for generic IPv6 packets? Isn't that RFC 7112, for which Fernando is one author, which is now cited in RFC 8200? See note (3) in Section 4.5 of RFC 8200 - "Extension headers, if any, and the Upper-Layer header. These headers must be in the first fragment." Tim
- Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Timothy Winters
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Bob Hinden
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments 神明達哉
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Tom Herbert
- RE: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Ron Bonica
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Erik Kline
- RE: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Ron Bonica
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Ron Bonica
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Tom Herbert
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Mark Andrews
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Simon Hobson
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Erik Kline
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments David Farmer
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Mark Andrews
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Tom Herbert
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Erik Kline
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Carsten Bormann
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments 神明達哉
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Fernando Gont
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Fernando Gont
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Fernando Gont
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Mark Andrews
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Bjoern A. Zeeb
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Bjoern A. Zeeb
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Timothy Winters
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Fernando Gont
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Fernando Gont
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Ole Troan
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Timothy Winters
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Tom Herbert
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Simon Hobson
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Fernando Gont
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Fernando Gont
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments David Farmer
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Tom Herbert
- RE: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Ron Bonica
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments David Farmer
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Tom Herbert
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Bob Hinden
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments David Farmer
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Tom Herbert
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Erik Kline
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Fernando Gont
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Fernando Gont
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Tom Herbert
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Fernando Gont
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Christian Huitema
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Ole Troan
- RE: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Lubashev, Igor
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Tom Herbert
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Tom Herbert
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Ole Troan
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Tom Herbert
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Ole Troan
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Nick Hilliard
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Bob Hinden
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Tom Herbert
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Ole Troan
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Nick Hilliard
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Ole Troan
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Tom Herbert
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Nick Hilliard
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Tom Herbert
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Manfredi (US), Albert E
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Bjoern A. Zeeb
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Fernando Gont
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Fernando Gont
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Fernando Gont
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Erik Kline
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Mark Smith
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Fernando Gont
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Tom Herbert
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Simon Hobson
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Nick Hilliard
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Fernando Gont
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Tom Herbert
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Nick Hilliard
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Bjoern A. Zeeb
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Simon Hobson
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Nick Hilliard
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Tom Herbert
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Tom Herbert
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Mark Andrews
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Erik Kline
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Nick Hilliard
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Ole Troan
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Erik Kline
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Fernando Gont
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Tom Herbert
- End-to-end (was Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments) Christian Huitema
- Re: End-to-end (was Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragm… Tom Herbert
- Re: End-to-end (was Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragm… Nick Hilliard
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Warren Kumari
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Fernando Gont
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Fernando Gont
- Re: End-to-end (was Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragm… Fernando Gont
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Tim Chown
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Fernando Gont
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Warren Kumari
- Re: End-to-end (was Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragm… Tom Herbert
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Ole Troan
- Re: End-to-end (was Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragm… Fernando Gont
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Fernando Gont
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Fred Baker
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Tim Chown
- Re: End-to-end (was Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragm… Tom Herbert
- Re: End-to-end (was Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragm… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Non-Last Small IPv6 Fragments Michael Richardson
- Never fragment: getting PMTU info transmitted rel… Michael Richardson
- Re: Never fragment: getting PMTU info transmitted… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Never fragment: getting PMTU info transmitted… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Never fragment: getting PMTU info transmitted… Tom Herbert
- Re: Never fragment: getting PMTU info transmitted… Michael Richardson
- Re: Never fragment: getting PMTU info transmitted… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Never fragment: getting PMTU info transmitted… Mark Smith
- Re: Never fragment: getting PMTU info transmitted… Erik Kline
- Re: Never fragment: getting PMTU info transmitted… Mark Smith
- Re: Never fragment: getting PMTU info transmitted… Tom Herbert
- Re: Never fragment: getting PMTU info transmitted… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Never fragment: getting PMTU info transmitted… Lubashev, Igor
- Re: Never fragment: getting PMTU info transmitted… Tom Herbert
- RE: Never fragment: getting PMTU info transmitted… Lubashev, Igor
- Re: Never fragment: getting PMTU info transmitted… C. M. Heard
- Re: Never fragment: getting PMTU info transmitted… Christian Huitema