Re: 6MAN IETF98 Call for agenda items

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Sat, 04 March 2017 12:31 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D394129539 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Mar 2017 04:31:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.333
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.333 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1JW4vvlxjwRS for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Mar 2017 04:31:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBC7912952C for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Mar 2017 04:31:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id v24CVWu0012068 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Mar 2017 13:31:32 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 13DC4203AA1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Mar 2017 13:31:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0232027AD for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Mar 2017 13:31:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [132.166.84.69] ([132.166.84.69]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id v24CVUK7003885 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Mar 2017 13:31:31 +0100
Subject: Re: 6MAN IETF98 Call for agenda items
To: ipv6@ietf.org
References: <90F2B6EE-E8DB-4204-95DD-712E1EE828E8@employees.org> <CAAedzxq0bioFo5qu7rt4dm+6VnTDCmu-P3PcCXFTmcEG4g5wbQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <8a62f361-4850-a69f-e271-0bfdf9116736@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2017 13:31:35 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAAedzxq0bioFo5qu7rt4dm+6VnTDCmu-P3PcCXFTmcEG4g5wbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/wgFy3uMQ472U_mdzGB-Jv41MyKo>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2017 12:31:35 -0000

I do not oppose a slot presenting PIO-X if time allows.

However, as I understand it, PIO-X has a single goal - that to 
accomodate 64share.

I wonder whether PIO-X could work with DHCPv6-PD?  Would PIO-X help 
DHCPv6-PD deployment?

This is what I am going to ask at the mic.

Alex



Le 01/03/2017 à 11:27, Erik Kline a écrit :
> Ole,
>
> It's on me to get a -02 of PIO-X written and uploaded.  Might it be
> possible to get 5 minutes on that?
>
> -ek
>
> On 27 February 2017 at 06:16, <otroan@employees.org
> <mailto:otroan@employees.org>> wrote:
>
>     The 6MAN chairs are planning the meeting in Chicago at IETF98.
>
>     If you have a draft you would like to discuss, please send your
>     request for agenda time to the 6man chairs.   Please include in the
>     request, the title of the presentation, file name of the draft, the
>     speaker's name (and email), and how much time you would like.
>
>     We will prioritise drafts that are working group items and drafts
>     that have been actively discussed on the list.
>
>     We expect at least half of each talk’s presentation time to be used
>     for open discussion,
>     please plan your presentation accordingly.
>
>     New drafts not discussed on the mailing list prior to the meeting,
>     or drafts that do not appear to have support from the working group
>     are unlikely to get time at the meeting.
>
>     Please have agenda items to us by 2017-03-15.
>
>     Regards,
>
>     Bob & Ole
>
>     --------------------------------------------------------------------
>     IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>     ipv6@ietf.org <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
>     Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>     <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>
>     --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>