Re: draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Sat, 07 July 2012 21:22 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5DAC21F869F for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 14:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vL+HQlvp2DNk for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 14:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000:226:55ff:fe57:14db]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE3121F8685 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 14:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eeepc.viagenie.ca (211.17-ppp.3menatwork.com [72.0.211.17]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD8C7425E8 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 17:22:39 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4FF8AA14.8070201@viagenie.ca>
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 14:28:52 -0700
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; OpenBSD i386; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120207 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02
References: <4FF696AA.3050508@tut.fi>
In-Reply-To: <4FF696AA.3050508@tut.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 21:22:20 -0000

On 07/06/12 00:41, Aleksi Suhonen wrote:
> It would be my recommendation that there was either a Router
> Advertisement Flags Option for "do not use privacy extensions here" and
> that this was used in all setups that use DNS64 name servers, or that
> all such setups should use Managed Address Configuration aka DHCPv6
> address configuration.

...only when your NAT64 is configured to provide 1:1 mapping between 
IPv4 and IPv6 addresses. Privacy extensions have been working fine for 
us with n:1 mapping.

Simon
-- 
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca