Re: draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02
Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Sat, 07 July 2012 21:22 UTC
Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id B5DAC21F869F for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sat, 7 Jul 2012 14:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000,
BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vL+HQlvp2DNk for
<ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 14:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (unknown
[IPv6:2620:0:230:8000:226:55ff:fe57:14db]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with
ESMTP id 3EE3121F8685 for <ipv6@ietf.org>;
Sat, 7 Jul 2012 14:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eeepc.viagenie.ca (211.17-ppp.3menatwork.com [72.0.211.17]) by
jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD8C7425E8 for <ipv6@ietf.org>;
Sat, 7 Jul 2012 17:22:39 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4FF8AA14.8070201@viagenie.ca>
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 14:28:52 -0700
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; OpenBSD i386;
rv:9.0) Gecko/20120207 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02
References: <4FF696AA.3050508@tut.fi>
In-Reply-To: <4FF696AA.3050508@tut.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>,
<mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>,
<mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 21:22:20 -0000
On 07/06/12 00:41, Aleksi Suhonen wrote: > It would be my recommendation that there was either a Router > Advertisement Flags Option for "do not use privacy extensions here" and > that this was used in all setups that use DNS64 name servers, or that > all such setups should use Managed Address Configuration aka DHCPv6 > address configuration. ...only when your NAT64 is configured to provide 1:1 mapping between IPv4 and IPv6 addresses. Privacy extensions have been working fine for us with n:1 mapping. Simon -- DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
- draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02 Aleksi Suhonen
- Re: draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02 Michael Richardson
- Re: draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02 Simon Perreault
- Re: draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02 Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02 Cameron Byrne
- Re: draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02 Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02 Simon Perreault
- Re: draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02 Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02 Aleksi Suhonen
- Re: draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02 GangChen
- Re: draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02 Michael Richardson
- Re: draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02 GangChen
- Re: draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02 Behcet Sarikaya